#RealYaduvanshis
I am posting some of the excerpts from the ASI Reports of 1862-1884 on Yaduvnahsi Kshatriyas.
Important points of the Report:
1. Only Jadon Rajputs were known to be Yaduvanshis, & descendants of Surasaini Kingdom.
All the Kukurmuttas who today claim to be-
I am posting some of the excerpts from the ASI Reports of 1862-1884 on Yaduvnahsi Kshatriyas.
Important points of the Report:
1. Only Jadon Rajputs were known to be Yaduvanshis, & descendants of Surasaini Kingdom.
All the Kukurmuttas who today claim to be-
-Yaduvanshis came out of nowhere, very recently with absolutely Zero evidences.
2. The Surasenas of 7th Century BC were descendants of Krishna and ancestors of Jadon Rajputs, a large portion of there actual territory was held by Karauli Jadon Rajputs till independence.
2. The Surasenas of 7th Century BC were descendants of Krishna and ancestors of Jadon Rajputs, a large portion of there actual territory was held by Karauli Jadon Rajputs till independence.
Alexander Cunningham found an inscription of Karauli Yaduvanshi Jadon Rajputs dated 1107 AD, with the name of the Yaduvanshi Rajas in the same braj region as of Surasaini Kingdom. The Karauli Jadons ruled the same kingdom for next 800 yrs till independence.
Raja Dharam Pal(~800AD) is called 77th descendant of Shri Krishna in these records and ruled the same Braj Region. The inscription was found in a Mandir turned Masjid in Bayana of the Braj region.
List of Names of Yaduvanshi Rajas of Karauli from Raja Dharam Pal. One of the amazing things found in these records is the credibility of Bhats and there records, which matches the names of 900 yr old Inscription.
The list was further completed by Cunningham upto the Rule of Maharaja Arjun Pala Deo in1 879, Maharaja Yadukul Chandra Bhal KRISHAN CHANDRA PAL is present Raja of Karauli State of Jadon rajputs. Bhatis, Jadejas & Chudasama rajputs are offshoots of Jadons only.
My Comment: Today, I see just n no. of people claiming to be Yaduvanshis and Surasainis, when in fact none of their ancestors ever claimed to be one.
The ahirs being Yaduvanshis have been established by Media portals & bollywood like Universal truth in our minds, when infact-
The ahirs being Yaduvanshis have been established by Media portals & bollywood like Universal truth in our minds, when infact-
-till 1910, none of them ever claimed to be Yaduvanshis, similar case is found among some Sainis who claim to be Surasainis, which is flabbergasting as I have not yet seen a single valid historical evidence which claims so, apart from the similarity of their patronyms.
Indians have made a mockery out of real history and all this is done for political gains, where very little stress is given on actual facts.
Loading suggestions...