To those who recognise the history of virological GOF, this picture paints a thousand words. One funded by the NIAID, and one by the Rothschilds. Yoshihiro Kawaoka and Ron Fouchier 👇
Lest we forget.......we are doomed to repeat the misadventure? Did we forget, Kawaoka and Fouchier GOF 🤔👇
Prof Kawaoka in 2011: Influenza A virus augmented with Hiv HRB proteins 👇
And what about Prof. Ron Fouchier from Erasmus MC, Rotterdam. Avian Flu 👇
And what did Jeremy Farrar and Antony Fauci think about this GOF Research? They called a WHO meeting. Fauci stated that a balance has to be weighed between public interest and the non-impedimant of science 👇
The money trail never lies. Why invest $ into a dead horse? Why invest at all into an institution that one "cannot" have oversight of?? 👇
So the Obama Administration seemingly stopped GOF research funding in 2014?! 🤔 But resumed the protocol after review? Oh Wuhan, where is they steel, where is they vice....?? 👇
So, where did this funding of the NIH lead to? The funding that Fauci denied was GOF 👇
How about GOF 👇
Oh Wuhan, the CCP of Intention, in collaboration with Duke-NUS 👇
Who else is prominent at Duke-NUS? Linfa Wang, the contemporary of Shi Zenghli. He may not have known, but Danielle Anderson may certainly well have done 👇
Ok, what about Chinese investment in Wuhan, too? Surely GOF is 'Dual Use Research of Concern' (DURC) 👇
The money trail continues to Ecohealth and to the WIV 👇
The NIH oversaw Ecohealth at the WIV, so Lab-leak surely not so likely? After all, the WIV was 18 Kms away from the Hubei wet-market 🤔 👇
Of course, the GOF funding was rejected 👇
Contd. from the above article 👇
Nevertheless, the NIH funding to Ecohealth continued. The Project headed by Daszak to: Search for possible "spillover" hotspots, study wet-markets, and predictive receptor 'binding' assays 🤔 No 'vaccine' development mentioned though 👇
And, of course, there is the peripatetic Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation too. Always a good source of funding?! 👇
Though the DARPA proposal was rejected, funded by PREDICT and the NIH, the most "enigmatic" paper by Ecohealth and the WIV was published on the 9th Nov '19, outlining the paradox of "the non-threat of 'direct contact' with bats to human health", just at the cusp of SarsCov2?? 👇
Contd. Authors, including Daszak, Shi Zenghli, and Hongying Li, diligently expressed the necessity for an "intermediary" animal for transmission to humans? Quite a dramatic turnaround from previous papers. Link to the paper below, and two extracts 👇
#bib60" target="_blank" rel="noopener" onclick="event.stopPropagation()">sciencedirect.com
#bib60" target="_blank" rel="noopener" onclick="event.stopPropagation()">sciencedirect.com
The contradiction to the above paper cannot be more self-evident than from the paper below, published 2013, by Ecohealth/WIV, including Shi, Daszak, Ben Hu, and G.Crameri, as part of PREDICT. It highlights specifically an SL-COV that utilises ACE2? 🤔👇
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Moreover, also a "warning" paper below published on March 14th 2016, Authors: Baric, Menachery, and Boyd Yount, which seemingly also acknowledges approval of the NIH in its GOF research despite the US government moratorium on such work? Interesting👇
pnas.org
pnas.org
So, why the change of "emphasis" away from direct transmission to humans (below left), to "the necessity" for an animal intermediary (below right), the latter published right at the the cusp of the emergence of SarsCov2? Both papers Ecohealth and the WIV 👇
@Daoyu15 @Jikkyleaks
@Daoyu15 @Jikkyleaks
In effect, it was a deft shift of "attention" away from what is effectively (GOF) to the Zoonotism of SarsL-Covs. So who was heavily involved in the South China bat study of "Human-animal interactions" which concluded "direct contact with bats was not perilous?" 👇
Kingston University, London? A well respected choice of establishment. Duke/NUS also highly prestigious. Prof Fielder of Kingston University was involved in the 2019 paper with Zenghli, Daszak, and Hongying Li 👇
No comment, apart from that, if Sir Richard Dearlove is concerned, then the CCP influence may be just as 'pandemic' as the virus itself? And also that, SarsCov2 may not have necessarily have been just a LabLeak. But that is too dangerous to say with DURC👇
dailymail.co.uk
dailymail.co.uk
Just for the record 👇
@dezying
@dezying
"I smell a RaTG13 from Yunnan!": The so-called backbone of SarsCov2 itself never came into existence until after Covid-19 was identified? RatG13 and WIV02 isolate from Cov-19 came into existence on the very same day, 27th Jan 2020. How was this ever considered acceptable?? 👇
RatG13 came from Shi Zhengli's own paper published on the 3rd February 2020. RaTG13 was evidently sequenced from a very short genetic seq. of a Bat-Cov collected from 2013 in Yunnan, Ra4991. So RaTG13 never existed until after SarsCov2! 👇
Link to the above paper by Shi Zhengli (or should I say the PLA) and the phylogenetic tree showing the affinity of RaTG13 and SarsCov2, remembering that the complete genome of RaTG13 was never uploaded to Genebank until Jan '20👇
nature.com
nature.com
Shi Zenghli is not to blame. The WIV was used by the PLA. She had no choice. The CCP had their own scientists embedded at the WIV and at the Wuhan CDC Lab BSL-2 in Wuhan. For the record, here is the partial gen.seq Ra4991 from which came mighty RaTG13 👇
It's a problem, as the first man to sequence Wu-hu-1 (SarsCov2) was Prof Yong-Zhen Zhang of Fudan University, Shanghai. It was released on the 11th February to virologist, Edward Holmes. RatG13 is fabricated 👇
As a colleague pointed out below, Ra4991 is just 370 nucleotides long? But since SarsCov2 was a "novel" coronavirus, the first sequence to ratify it as 'novel' IS the RdRp 👇
Thank God for Sanger sequencing?! Here's the PLA addendum to the published paper by Shi Zenghli originally published 3rd Feb '20 regarding the full sequencing of Ra4991, the 370 nt long genetic seq. 👇😁
Link to the above peer-reviewed article 🤔👇
#ref-CR1" target="_blank" rel="noopener" onclick="event.stopPropagation()">nature.com
#ref-CR1" target="_blank" rel="noopener" onclick="event.stopPropagation()">nature.com
Here's a bit of light entertainment. I know it gets boring, but think of the lockdowns, the mRNA jabs, and Joe Biden?! Hmmm......,yes 👇
dailymail.co.uk
dailymail.co.uk
No comment, apart from this man is correct 👇
And what did the PLA of China think about it? They found "a short region of RdRp" (370Nts, Ra4991) which became RatG13, which links SarsCov2 to Yunnan. Here's the 'official' narrative from Shi Zhengli 👇
Prof. Cao Wuchan, Medical Military Science Academy of the PLA, graduated from Erasmus MB University in 1996. The Two-Tier System of the 🇨🇳 CDC. There is only one controller. Who took over Wuhan??👇
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Contd from the above article: A very interesting link to Erasmus MB, Rotterdam (with its notorious history of GOF) and the PLA "oversight" of the 🇨🇳 CDC 👇
If Shi Zenghli had any semblance of conscience and knew the 'PLA connections' and was literally told to "invent" RaTG13 then she would give a clue to the backbone of SarsCov2? Here, is some evidence that she indeed did. No coincidence 👇
And here is who financed the bat Coronavirus research from Zhoushan 👇
And in that very paper of 31st Jan '20 Zenghli revealed not only the backbone coronaviruses of SarsCov2, but that they had already developed a pan-Cov inhibitor, EK1. This is before her RaTG13 paper of Feb '20👇
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
'Helped' is an interesting choice of word, as Wuchan Cao is linked to both Duke-NUS and Erasmus MB. The PLA lady is Major General Chen Wei who "took-over" the WIV?! Yes, think about that? 🤔👇
Sorry to repeat myself. Just a reminder! 👇
And what about the infamous Mojiang miners, whose fame kept the RaTG13 Yunnan mystery alight until this day? Well, their deaths were not even related to bats! Even Linfa Wang agreed 👇
A Paramyxovirus from Rats. Maybe that's how RaTG13 got it's name! 👇
So the only link of SarsCov2 to Yunnan at all is the 370nt (Ra4991) RdRp gene seq. chosen by the "engineers" of SarsCov2 to give it the lineage away from Zhoushan. Ra4991 (aka. RaTG13) was uploaded from a fecal sample in Mar 2015 by the WIV 👇
The lineage to Yunnan and South China is historically rational, and therefore acceptable, as that is where Sars 2003 was said to have originated from in a spillover from bats via palm civets. That story was accepted; why not again?! 👇
To repeat, the paper published in 2013 by Daszak, Shi Zenghli, and Linfa Wang of Dukes-NUS, specifically stated that "civets" may NOT have been necessary at all for SARS 2003. Civets in the wild were found NOT to be a natural host for Betacoronaviruses as they used ACE2👇
In essence, SARS 2003 was regarded by many as the deployment at a wet-market in southern China, to use "animal-spillover" as the zoonotic excuse, of what indeed was a Bio-weapon. And there is NO evidence to say that this could NOT have been the case?? NONE!
Actually, disproven? As no intermediary was necessary.......👇
So now we can ask ourselves: if "palm civets" were not necessary for SARS 2003......but a very good 'zoonotic' excuse, how about "the Pangolins" as the intermediary of SarsCov2 of 2019!
Shi Zenghli knew it was "biowarfare". She knew the PLA were imbedded in the Chinese CDC and the WIV. Here, she cleared her conscience, referring to the prophylaxis treatments and the backbone ZC45 & ZXC21 of SarsCov2 👇
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
From Shi Zhengli paper of Jan 2020. Why, if she wanted to be a part of the Deep State?? 👇
So how did Maj Gen. Chen Wei become the 🇨🇳 chief Bio-weapon expert? She invented an obviously exclusive "interferon spray inhibitor" for SARS. Chen Wei also 'took-over' the WIV. She is the boss of Wuchan Cao 👇
However, she also invents "vaccines". Vaccines for the people. Does this sound very familiar to what has been going-on in the West. Where were the EK1 inhibitors for the West?? No, we got the mRNA vaccines, much the same as 🇨🇳👇
Maj Gen. Chen Wei and Zhong Nanshan of 🇨🇳 embark on a new type of vaccine 🤔👇
So who is Dr Zhong Nanshan of China? The 🇨🇳 Dr Fauci of the Deep State👇
Birds of a feather, perhaps? Who is ahead of the "game"......A very good question?? They both believe that "natural immunity" is NOT efficacious. Yet, again, sounds very familiar👇
Shanghai, the 🇨🇳 City of "Lockdowns" extraordinaire, and the 🇨🇳 City of sadness. Ask Dr Eric Feigl-Ding?! Mr Daoyu knows much better @Daoyu👇
@DrEricDing
@DrEricDing
To repeat, sorry....who was first to release the genetic sq. of SarsCov2 but the Fudan University of Shanghai and Prof. Zhang Yong-Zhen. The University was itself put into quarantine, though he had to 'deny' it 👇
How was the Bio-security of the WIV? Let's ask the French. They were the chief "advisors" and protagonists. No problem at all, evidently. Mr Rene Courcal from France is in charge. Never a Lab-leak, and that is most possibly correct? It was 'never' a Lab-leak. No, deliberate👇
Viva La France, in thee we trust 👇
rfi.fr
rfi.fr
We do. So, moreover, did James LeDuc of the MUTB 👇
James LeDuc questioned the 🇨🇳 CDC, NOT the WIV about Coronavirus research? Why not question Dr Yuan Zhiming, Vice-director of the WIV? And the answer is the 🇨🇳 CDC were in on the project??
The WIV answer below, and most probably, entirely genuine 👇
So what does Prof. Pei-yong Shi of the UTMB think about it? Let's get the vaccines ready!! 👇
The Link from the the UTMB and the 🇨🇳 CDC. How quaint and opportune. 👆
And Ping Yong-Shei of the UTMB is destined to arrive at the WIV, Wuhan on Oct 19 2019. Good timing👇
The 🇨🇳 PLA infiltrated the WIV 👇
Contd. from the above article. Unfortunately, Dr Zhou disappeared 👇
Chinese Snakebite?! Perhaps? What does Moderna's Co-founder think about it? The "Codon Optimisation" is certainly homologous to SarsCov2 👇
A conflict of interests? Accepted in January 2020, the "Codon optimisation" homology of Chinese Krait cobra (bungurus multicintus) and ZC45 & ZXC21. 🤔👇
Sorry about the quality. However, that summation of ZC45 & ZXC21 "codon optimisation" of SarsCov2 came from Wuhan and Guangxi, the land of the Pangolins! How convenient? Here is the Zoonotic theory of "spillover" from Chen Wei's subordinate, Wuchan Cao, of Pangolins 👇
The facts are the facts. Link to the above paper regrading "Pangolins" and the chief author below, left 🤔👇
nature.com
nature.com
In effect, ZC45 & ZXC21 have a very similar "Codon" usage as compared to Snake and SarsCov2. But 'Pangolins' are a good South China, Yunnan, intermediary host, and proved NOT to be a natural reservoir of SarsCov2, in the same way as "palm civets" were never for SARS 2003.
So what does a professional "insider" who escaped to the USA, to save her life, what did she think about it? Dr Yan Li-Meng, formerly of the University of Hong Kong 👇
taiwannews.com.tw
taiwannews.com.tw
She knew that ZC45 & ZXC21 were the backbone of SarsCov2. It takes courage to admit that from a Chinese source?
@R_H_Ebright @DrEricDing
@R_H_Ebright @DrEricDing
Yes 👇
Sorry to repeat myself, but human history is the history of the repeating of mistakes? We live to learn. Even those who "signed" the Lancet Paper, and those who endorsed it!👇
The 🇨🇳 PLA were in control from the initial outset of the construction of the PSL-4 Lab at Wuhan, which basically was completed in January 2015. The PLA "warning" signs were already there! 👇 spectator.org
How many other Professors, such as Prof. Lieber (ex-Chair of Harvard University's Chemistry and Chemical Biology Dept) are "ingratiated" with the 🇨🇳? How many other 🇨🇳 nationals in the US, such as Zheng, steal biological research vials, lest we forget?? 👇 justice.gov
It was 'predicted' that a Pandemic was on its way in September 2019 by "The Global Preparedness Monitoring Board" (GPMB) whose members include the Welcome Trust (Sir Jeremy Farrar), the B&M Gates Found., the 🇨🇳CDC, as they issued a report to that effect 👇
foreignpolicy.com
foreignpolicy.com
"The Global Preparedness Monitoring Board" (GPMB) was set up in 2018 by the WHO and the World Bank. So, no 'surprises' if SarsCov2 appeared in 2019 then.....or there should NOT have been? 👇
gpmb.org
gpmb.org
So how is it that 'Sir Jeremy Farrar' on the board of GPMB confirms he ended up confiding in Eliza Manningham -Buller, then chair of the Welcome Trust and former head of 'MI5', and is told to "start to use a burner phone??" Dangerous virus, this one?! 🤔👇
unherd.com
unherd.com
The FCS presented by Edward Holmes. Virologists be aware? It's only Sanger Sequencing and NOT the FCS we would anticipate! They even say so.......
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
And who provided the genomic sequences? Yes, the 🇨🇳 PLA, and Mr Wuchan Cao. Any answers virologists?
@R_H_Ebright @CharlesRixey @MonaRahalkar @Daoyu15
@R_H_Ebright @CharlesRixey @MonaRahalkar @Daoyu15
What did Zenghli, Daszak, Linfa Wang, and Edward Holmes, in Aug '20, truthfully think about Pangolins as a natural resorvoir for SarsCov2?? NOT a lot evidently! Professional pride, perhaps? They still had to reference RaTG13, whilst dismissing it too 🤔👇
#ref-CR20" target="_blank" rel="noopener" onclick="event.stopPropagation()">nature.com
#ref-CR20" target="_blank" rel="noopener" onclick="event.stopPropagation()">nature.com
And they had to refer to RaTG13 to validate it as "bona fide", since they only ever had a 370nt RdRp sequence for it from a fecal sample prior to 2018? That is according to Shi (or should I say, the PLA) 👇
Just a reminder to ALL the great scientists and virologists. Lest we forget?! 👇
So who provided these lovely "dead" Pangolin seqs. and literally 'aligned' them with RaTG13 in the paper of March 2020?? Yes, you guessed it, Wuchan Cao, of the 🇨🇳 PLA. How Zoonotic. No problem?!👇
nature.com
nature.com
Now we know why the WIV was taken over and Shanghai University was shut down for rectification. I prefer to say, "RaTG13-ification"👇
The choice of the RdRp of Ra4991 (which became RaTG13) from Yunnan for SarsCov2 was purposely chosen to link to South China and the land of the Pangolins, Guangxi and Guandong. Yan Li-Meng explains much more, including its possibility as choice for antiviral antidote selection 👇
And "Yan Research" backed up the valid scientific claims with a letter to "the WHO" asking for a thorough investigation of the 🇨🇳 sequencing data which appeared coordinated and manipulated. Not much help there! 👇
To conclude the "de-ratification" of the pseudo-virus RaTG13 (Ra4991) is Daoyu Zhang with an appraisal of papers which investigated the latter. Basically, scientific evidence suggests that RaTG13 was an elaborate virological fraud! How quaint 👇
zenodo.org
zenodo.org
Loading suggestions...