WHOA!
This should prompt the immediate criminal investigation of Bonnie Henry and Monika Naus.
Dr Charles Hoffe raised the alarm IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST to the correct authorities on April 7th.
They then set about undermining him resulting in his punitive suspension.
This should prompt the immediate criminal investigation of Bonnie Henry and Monika Naus.
Dr Charles Hoffe raised the alarm IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST to the correct authorities on April 7th.
They then set about undermining him resulting in his punitive suspension.
The use of the "PHONE" in capitals is to avoid any record of what they wanted to say. The fact that ANY of this email trail was redacted is in itself a potential crime under the FOI Act.
Here is what subsequently happened to Charles Hoffe
visiontimes.com
Here is what subsequently happened to Charles Hoffe
visiontimes.com
The FOI release not only implicates Dr Henry but also the decision maker of the FOI release, who is obligated NOT to protect wrongdoers in the public sector.
This could be very big.
For reference here is BC's PID law
whistleblowersecurity.com
This could be very big.
For reference here is BC's PID law
whistleblowersecurity.com
All public interest disclosures made in the interest of public safety - which clearly this is - are considered public interest disclosures under PID Acts.
There can be very serious penalties for punishing doctors who raise safety concerns about drugs
@TonyNikolic10
There can be very serious penalties for punishing doctors who raise safety concerns about drugs
@TonyNikolic10
Loading suggestions...