For the first time since summer 2021, I believe bonds are looking like a decent risk/reward investment here.
And if that’s true, many other asset classes will behave differently too.
Accordingly, last week I have made some important changes to my book.
A thread.
1/18
And if that’s true, many other asset classes will behave differently too.
Accordingly, last week I have made some important changes to my book.
A thread.
1/18
For decades, bonds have been a beautiful asset to own in a diversified portfolio: a positive carry, return generating asset class with the ability to dampen equity market drawdowns.
An excellent asset to own.
But does this hold true in every macro regime?
2/
An excellent asset to own.
But does this hold true in every macro regime?
2/
Once inflation expectations surpass the CB’s objective (2%), when equity markets experience a drawdown policymakers are faced with a hard choice.
- accommodate conditions to stop the market bleeding
OR
- stay the course & preserve credibility
Not a slam dunk for bonds
4/
- accommodate conditions to stop the market bleeding
OR
- stay the course & preserve credibility
Not a slam dunk for bonds
4/
So, what about today?
Wen bonds?
Amongst many other things, I like to see 3 conditions achieved before entering bullish trades in fixed income.
5/
Wen bonds?
Amongst many other things, I like to see 3 conditions achieved before entering bullish trades in fixed income.
5/
3. Are Central Banks (directly or indirectly) giving us the green light to buy bonds?
Indirectly: yes.
The Direct green light is the 1st phase of monpol accommodation: when they explicitly pivot dovish or they engage in QE, they are giving us a direct signal to lift bonds.
8/
Indirectly: yes.
The Direct green light is the 1st phase of monpol accommodation: when they explicitly pivot dovish or they engage in QE, they are giving us a direct signal to lift bonds.
8/
Ofc not the case today.
But we are getting instead the Indirect Green Light
CBs have tightened policy hard enough for long enough to basically guarantee a sharp economic slowdown
As they are enhancing the probability of nominal growth reverting to weak structural trends…
9/
But we are getting instead the Indirect Green Light
CBs have tightened policy hard enough for long enough to basically guarantee a sharp economic slowdown
As they are enhancing the probability of nominal growth reverting to weak structural trends…
9/
In other words, the distribution of outcomes for future nominal growth becomes more predictable: once enough short-term damage is done, long-term growth is almost guaranteed to disappoint.
And in turn that means long-term bonds are more attractive.
11/
And in turn that means long-term bonds are more attractive.
11/
As we are ticking 2-and-a-bit of the 3 boxes, it’s time to adjust portfolios accordingly
My changes have been:
- I’ve taken profits on the SPX short
And I have added:
- 2x short Russell vs 1x long Nasdaq
- 2s10s curve flattener in US
- Some TLT for the long-term book
12/
My changes have been:
- I’ve taken profits on the SPX short
And I have added:
- 2x short Russell vs 1x long Nasdaq
- 2s10s curve flattener in US
- Some TLT for the long-term book
12/
Powell told us he isn’t gonna dial back his hawkish stance despite clear signs of demand destruction emerging in both forward-looking indicators & now also in several macro asset classes.
13/
13/
As time goes by, this is going to increase the probability of a recession & the attractiveness of long-term bonds
Yield curves should meaningfully invert: recession warnings keep flashing in the back-end & Powell forces the front-end to reflect his unchanged hawkish stance
14/
Yield curves should meaningfully invert: recession warnings keep flashing in the back-end & Powell forces the front-end to reflect his unchanged hawkish stance
14/
Flatteners and short bond vol are my preferred expressions, but I also started accumulating some TLTs (yet leaving some room to add).
In equities instead, something interesting might happen.
15/
In equities instead, something interesting might happen.
15/
The long-end bond stabilization might spur a tentative bid in tech while US small caps are likely to disproportionately suffer from an earnings slowdown
I want to capture the relative value there but I want to keep my net equity short exposure: long 1x QQQ, short 2x IWM
16/
I want to capture the relative value there but I want to keep my net equity short exposure: long 1x QQQ, short 2x IWM
16/
As always I can be wrong: if the economy picks up or the Fed is keen in keeping yield curves (temporarily) steeper (active QT selling of long bonds) I will be wrong and stop out accordingly.
Overall though I feel a macro regime shift is undergoing.
17/
Overall though I feel a macro regime shift is undergoing.
17/
If you liked this thread, you are going to enjoy my free newsletter TheMacroCompass.substack.com where I deliver macro insights and often post about portfolio construction too.
We are 62,000+ strong, come have a look: it’s free :)
18/18
We are 62,000+ strong, come have a look: it’s free :)
18/18
Loading suggestions...