This process is far more scientific than the circular reasoning of
"Oh look, with new primers, we found a new variant in Africa. This had to have evolved from the current variant (in a single month) BEECUZ there was nothing before the current variant."
GIGO.
"Oh look, with new primers, we found a new variant in Africa. This had to have evolved from the current variant (in a single month) BEECUZ there was nothing before the current variant."
GIGO.
This broaches the question:
What true dual-release evolution was so horrid, that the Chinese were even willing to suffer the embarrassment of a strawman 'WIV-accident', as a ruse thinly concealed by the ridiculous 'wet market' fairy tale?
What true dual-release evolution was so horrid, that the Chinese were even willing to suffer the embarrassment of a strawman 'WIV-accident', as a ruse thinly concealed by the ridiculous 'wet market' fairy tale?
This smacks of the tradecraft of Nelsonian Displacement disinformation.
Loading suggestions...