CyrilπŸ•Š
CyrilπŸ•Š

@Debest_of_Kings

16 Tweets 64 reads Jan 14, 2023
WOMEN DON'T LOVE MEN.
Sit tight, get your popcorn and enjoy this ride with me.
After what I will call 'A Critical thinking', I'm of the opinion that women don't love men. A woman's love is majorly centered on two things; her feelings or how you make her feel
and what she stands to gain or is gaining from you. That is why most people say women love opportunistically. For most men, they see love in it's ideal form. It's mainly men that love for the sake of falling in love, women don't do that.
Better put, women are incapable
of loving men to the purest form of love or to the extent of a pure love.
Purest form of love; God loving us in our weakness and sinful ways though we keep sinning yet he keeps loving us. This is by far the purest form of love.
Another example; A Mother nurturing
and taking care of her baby even though her baby can constitute great stress and burden to her yet she still loves her baby.
Notice in both examples, the Persons performing this act of love barely have anything to gain and the persons being loved not only have much to gain
but can constitute the Lovers great stress and burden and still remain loved. Also, the persons being loved can afford to be weak and helpless and still be loved. This is what I mean when I say Pure Love.
The persons being Loved can't say they love the Lover. No they don't.
The level of usefulness of the "Lover" is what the "Loved" calls love.
Whenever the "Loved" talks about love, i.e the love relationship between him/her and the "Lover", it is always about what he/she stands to gain or is gaining and not what the "Lover" benefits.
"I love God so much. He protects me, provides for me, forgives me my sins and heals my sickness".
"I love Mummy so much. She cooks for me, bathes me, cleans my poop and nurtures me".
"I love my boyfriend so much. He protects me, spoils me, takes me out on numerous
dates and expensive vacations".
Not only have I been able to prove that Women don't love men, I have been able to cite examples of other "Lover" and "Loved" relationship dynamics where the "Loved" is incapable of loving the "Lover" and calls the usefulness of the "Lover" love.
A Man can love a weak woman, A Woman can't love a weak man. Infact, a weak woman will be disgusted by the sight of a weak man. A Rich man would easily marry a poor man. A Rich woman won't even look at the face of a poor man.
The level of love a woman has for you most times depends on your level of usefulness/importance to her.
Your girlfriend or female partner is likely to break up with you once she becomes significantly more successful than you even if you assisted her on her journey to sucess.
What then is love when you're likely to be forsaken when you're low, down and weak by someone you loved not minding if they were weak or not. Indeed, it is anything else but love.
All these alone shows women are incapable of loving men.
This is not to say that a woman can't be genuinely interested in a man. Of course she can. That's Genuine desire. Genuine desire is what makes you authentically attracted to someone which has to do with the qualities the person posses. It could be physical features
or intrinsic qualities but not love in it's real sense.
Don't forget attraction and love are not the same thing. You could be attracted to someone and not love the person same way you could love someone and not be attracted to the person.
Indeed, even when the "Loved" tries to reciprocate the love the "Lover" gives, it's just never enough and can't be equated to the not so much to little or no expectation of anything in return which the "Lover" has while loving compared to that of the "Loved" who
always expects something in return and if possibly, bigger than the love he/she the "Loved" managed to give.
In Conclusion, the "Loved" being incapable of truly loving the "Lover" owes the "Lover" loyalty, submission and respect to match up the love
the "Lover" readily gives with not so much to little or no expectation of anything in return.
To those who read to the end, ❀ & πŸ’‘

Loading suggestions...