1. “Everything is energy and information, and that is all there is to it.   Match the frequency to the reality you want, and you can not help but get that reality. It can be no other way.  This is not philosophy.  This is physics.” — Anonymous
The importance of biochemical reactions in recognizing other chemicals by sensing their resonance cannot be overemphasized. This is precisely how quantum field mechanics is designed to work and precisely how classic science fails to work or explain what we observe. 
Hence, this is why biochemists believe action at a distance is “pseudoscience”.  Cells in a non-quantized world of ATP production must exist far from equilibrium.   This comes at a thermodynamic cost that Peter Mitchell's chemiosmotic theory cannot explain even today.  It matters little to me that he was given a Nobel in 1978. His theory breaks the second law of thermodynamics so I know it is pure centralized science BS. Let us look into that claim with some details for my critics.

2. Biochemistry beliefs:  A severe line of evidence comes from scrutinizing the thermodynamics of biological processes, especially enzyme reactions.  Like the outstanding anomalies of the pure liquid, a complete mechanistic explanation requires more than the random hydrogen bonding of one-state water.   Here is where the work of Dr. Philippi Wiggins is critical.  In particular, the ability of some enzymes to hydrolyze ATP, peptides, and polynucleotides, and others to synthesize ATP and biopolymers, a pervading phenomenon in biochemistry, which had no detailed molecular mechanism.
Mitchell's theories could not account for these reactions that happened in life.  I struggled with this until I realized how a coherent living system deals with this information problem.  Peter Mitchell’s concept of energy transduction, proposed in the 1960s, has survived to achieve the status of a textbook fact. Still, it does not constitute a quantum molecular mechanism in any living matrix.  I have heard many biochemistry lectures for Mitchell's thesis from its leaders and parrots.  That is not a good sign if you are following their solution for your biology when you are ill and trying to obtain Optimal.  Here is why I believe you better re-examine your beliefs now

3. The free energy change of a reaction indicates how far the reaction, as written, is from equilibrium and, therefore, whether or not the reaction will proceed spontaneously.  For example, the free energy change of the reaction:
Mg/ATP + H2O = ADP + Mg + Pi   is approximately −30 kJ/mol.

4. Here Pi means the mixture of H2PO4−/HPO4-2 that exists at the prevailing pH. This is a rather high negative free energy change, which means that the reaction, as written, will go spontaneously from left to right and that the reverse reaction from right to left has a free energy change of +30 kJ/mol and will not go spontaneously.
The magnitude of the free energy change shows that the reaction is far from equilibrium for some reason. As the reaction proceeds from left to right, 30 kJ/mol of energy is dissipated as heat. Is this somehow helpful in this case that we don’t appreciate?  The concept of energy transduction states that the negative free energy of a spontaneous reaction, such as hydrolysis of ATP, can be used to drive an uphill reaction, such as the movement of cations from low to high concentrations, provided that the two reactions are coupled in a single enzyme active site.

5. We need to take the case where the uphill reaction has a positive standard free energy change:
A=B with a delta G = +10Kj/mol
The spontaneous reaction has a larger negative standard free energy change
C=D with a delta G = −30Kj/mol
When the two reactions are coupled, the overall reactions are:
A + C = B + D
and the free energy change is ΔGo = +10–30 = −20 kJ/mol i.e. when the reactions are coupled, the sum of the two standard free energy changes is negative, and the uphill reaction can proceed.   The uphill reaction might be a movement of Na+ or H+ from a low concentration inside a cell to a higher concentration outside the cell and the spontaneous reaction hydrolysis of ATP.   This is called energy transduction.  It is taken to mean that free energy stored in the bonds of ATP can be converted to other forms of energy and harnessed to do work. Is there another transduction pathway we are missing?

6. This concept was vigorously debated in the 1960’s. Physical chemists pointed out that, however, wherever ATP was hydrolyzed, the free energy of that hydrolysis was dissipated as heat (big point) and could not be diverted to or bestowed upon another unrelated reaction, however hungry that response might be for kJ. Accurate coupling of reactions requires that a reactant of the uphill reaction is a product of the spontaneous reaction so that it is so rapidly scavenged that the reaction can proceed. In their turn, biochemists pointed out that whenever the two reactions occurred together in the active site of the sodium pump, ATP was hydrolyzed, and work for transport was performed. Without hydrolysis of ATP, no transport occurred.

7. The fallacy in their argument was that they believed that each step in the overall process must have a negative free energy change. Here are centralized biochemistry's inconvenient truth.   They believe Mitchell's theory,  and this leads to collateral damage.  What did they miss?  As I showed in EMF 7, the criterion that a reaction will proceed is simply that the free energy of the products is more damaging than that of the reactants. There can be ups and downs on the way from reactants to products, but as long as all the steps considered contribute to the overall unitary process, all that matters is the beginning and the end, irrespective of how the system gets there. 
Water, having a dual structure that allows it to be physically coherent,  was the critical missing piece to Mitchell’s ideas.  When we split water, we get OH– and lots of protons.  Might this reaction hold the clue?    Dr. Phillipi Wiggins, whom I mentioned in the opening of the EMF-7 blog post, provided the answers to Mitchell’s errors over the last 20 years.  This is where physics began to open the playbook for how life works on the quantum biological “thermodynamic playground.”  Wiggins's information provided me more information that two other scientists from the 1960s were also correct about their findings using Quantum electrodynamic theory.

8. Wiggins pointed out a critical paper by one of the groups participating in the debate gave an excellent clue as to the kind of “local environmental change” that phosphorylation of the enzyme caused. This told me the information was part of the equation biochemists were missing.  George et al. showed that the free energy of hydrolysis of molecules like ATP was given by the difference between the free energies of hydration of products and reactants. They called this paper “Squiggle-H2O. An inquiry into the importance of solvation effects in phosphate ester and anhydride reactions”. At this time, the terminal phosphate bond of ATP was called a high-energy bond and given the symbol ~P. The “Squiggle-H2O” paper showed that there was nothing special about squiggle P but that the hydration-free energies of all reaction components were crucial. This immediately suggested a way out of the impasse reached between physical chemists and biochemists. It is too bad most of them do not read biophysical papers to realize the solution is found in structured coherent water.  The key is buried in the story of the proton tunneling.

9. Phosphorylation of the pump protein's active site somehow changed the water's hydrogen-bonded structure inside that cavity. Changes in water-water bonding must change all free energies of hydration of solutes in that cavity. Some ions might move out of the water, which was less able to hydrate them (e.g., Na+, H+, Ca2+), and both the sign and the magnitude of the free energy of hydrolysis of ATP might also change so that synthesis became a spontaneous process. These changes in hydration-free energies are necessary consequences of a change in local water-water bonding because the first step in the solution of a solute is making a hole in the water big enough to accommodate it. This involves breaking many water/water bonds and freeing up protons. The free energy required to break bonds must change with the water structure.  Water binding to the open face of the proteins in cells provides the superconduction proton and electron highways that allow the quantum dance of life to happen.

10. When water superconduction is broken in you, due to modern life, you must rely on the rapid recycling of ATP from the pathways I mentioned in EMF-4.  This means that glycolysis and the PPP will be the metabolism the cell will have to rely on when there is a proton problem.  When you live in a world only powered by ATP, your sleep is the first thing to go south.  Initially, it becomes poor before it totally fails,  and you get diagnosed with sleep apnea.  As it goes on more chronically without proper treatment,  you eventually die from right-sided congestive heart disease and pulmonary hypertension.  Yes, in total sleep failure, you get a specific kind of heart failure preceded by a fatal heart arrhythmia.  Modern cardiology knows about this rhythm but still has not made the link to it I have because of the loss of water proton conduction.
When your sleep fails, it turns genes off that allow you to remain in a “zero entropy state” of health.   When quantum timing is off, life dies because it has to rely on ATP regeneration and recycling systems (EMF-4), which are only designed to support non-complex life like Archaea and Eubacteria……not a matrix loaded with the TCA with a complex nervous system in its head.

11. All molecules in cells are filled with water, are aligned, and work coherently together in our system.  This is why it is called a coherent energy/information transfer system.  The energy and information transfer occurs via water networks in tissue, which connect to every cell.  When you open a modern-day biochemistry book, they ignore that over 70% of cell content is water, and they go on about their business as if the water is just an innocent bystander to life’s chemistry.  Nothing is further from the truth.
When you marry the idea of how EMF resonance and biochemistry dance together, soon after that, biological semiconduction and energy generation and transfer in life make a lot of sense. Biochemical mysteries become explainable when you realize semi-conduction happens in a living cell and not in a research lab with its intracellular water removed in prep for the experiment.  It shows you that Mitchell’s work on chemiosmosis, the cell membrane, and Mg/ATPase are just a secondary system to energy efficiency to be used if life lost photons from the sun or electrons from the Earth for any reason.

12. Ling showed that in the 1950s and 1960s, Mitchell's thesis broke the second law of thermodynamics 500-fold. The stoichiometry of ATP synthesis could not account for the ATP a cell used. So, where did the energy come from? What was life's POW mechanism?

13. Robert O Becker provided the answers that Mitchell ignored. Once you understand that biology uses semiconduction as its primary energy source, you must question why it does this?  The answer becomes quite simple with reflection.  It seeks to circumvent and maximize the second law of thermodynamics by Lord Kelvin using quantum field theory.  The second law of thermodynamics states that the entropy of an isolated system never decreases because isolated systems spontaneously evolve towards thermodynamic equilibrium—the state of maximum entropy.  Entropy is a fancy name in physics for randomness.  Our environment is total chaos to a cell.  Chaos might be the critical building block in life.  Life’s goal makes sense of total chaos to live and to organize.  So, how does life solve this riddle?  Mother Nature used her design cells to build a zero entropy system where form always meets function.  When you use intelligent design as part of your original plan, you sidestep this complicated issue that has perplexed scientists for ages. Genes and metabolism are not what is published in textbook. Even Nick Lane is waking up to this and he still believes Mitchell's theory.

14. So, how did life do it?  In a semiconduction matrix, it is possible to create a system that uses coherent energy and information that can be stored within the system of biology to give life energy at any time it needs, for any reaction at any time, and not subject to space or time alterations.  This is what Becker showed experimentally as well. The system is circular because of one part of the cycle is a positive feedback loop and the other side is a negative feedback loop that keeps entropy under an organized control as long as the sun pumps a chronic source of energy/info into the system.  Information and energy are part of the equation, but they show no symmetry in a cell because of mitochondrial function.  That is how life does it.  In a system built by semiconduction, there is always energy available within the system 100% of the time because it is stored coherently organized and ready for use 100% of the time because of its complete freedom of use and overall space-time domains.  How information is handled is a black box in classical thermodynamics. When energy is constantly available, timing does not matter, but information does.  When energy declines for any reason,  time begins to matter in a big way, because information transfers drop faster, and aging occurs (heteroplasmy).  Time can be slowed down if you understand how quantum electrodynamic theory works even for you in your matrix.   I showed this at my Paleo Fx talk in 2011.  People at this event just could not wrap their heads around it because of their biochemical biases.  Now here is the foundational science to show you how it was done. When light is shined on a semiconductor it emits light back. Do all living things emit light when they are examined in a photomultiplier? Yes. See pics below Your biochemistry friends are IGNORANT

15. When something can occur simultaneously and instantaneously in a system by its semiconductive design,  timing becomes irrelevant as long as the external sources of energy and information are maintained.  When water semiconduction is lost, timing becomes quite relevant.  This is the situation humans now find themselves in over the last 1000 years.  When the external sources are diminished for any reason, this contributes to causing the process we call aging in all life forms. This is why life is built in a dissipative way.

16. Prigogine defined dissipative structures and their role in thermodynamic systems far from equilibrium, a discovery that won him the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1977. In summary, Ilya Prigogine discovered that importing and dissipating energy into chemical systems could result in new structures (hence dissipative structures) due to internal self-reorganization. In his 1955 text, Prigogine drew connections between dissipative structures, the Rayleigh-Bénard instability, and the Turing mechanism. Prigogine's theorem is germane to these ideas.
Mitochondria are dissipative structures in cells, but not the only ones. They transform energy and create order from the disorder in light energy they use to operate. The water mitochondria create is the most essential dissipative structure that life is based upon in cells. According to Prigogine, determinism loses its explanatory power in the face of irreversibility and instability in dissipative systems. This is a significant departure from the approach of Newton, Einstein, and Schrödinger, all of whom expressed their theories regarding deterministic equations. Prigogine's Nobel Prize essentially makes Mitchell's Nobel a facade of garbage.
Indeterminism is the opposite of determinism and is related to chance. Chance is related to probability. In science, most specifically quantum theory in physics, links directly to probability and not cause and effect. Here is another reason why studying biology with an RCT is not a wise option.

17. Indeterminism is the belief that no event is certain and the entire outcome of anything is probabilistic. Heisenberg's uncertainty principle and the "Born rule", proposed by Max Born, are often starting points in support of the indeterministic nature of the universe. Indeterminism is also asserted by Sir Arthur Eddington and Murray Gell-Mann. Indeterminism has been promoted by the French biologist Jacques Monod's essay "Chance and Necessity." Ilya Prigogine argued for indeterminism in complex systems such as life. At life's genesis chaos has to gain order. Dissipative structure theory really aims to solve this problem for biology by using physics. This is what Lane's latest updates to his theory really are saying now. It has taken biology 75 years to catch up to Ling and Becker.

18. Dissipative structure theory led to pioneering research in self-organizing systems, as well as philosophical inquiries into the formation of complexity on biological entities and the quest for a creative and irreversible role of time in the natural sciences. (Insert Micheal Levin)
Prigogine derives a well-known theorem of minimum entropy production, which states that entropy exported from a system reaches a minimum, or becomes zero, at thermodynamic equilibrium and at steady states close to thermodynamic equilibrium. Prigogine's theorem is a direct consequence of Onsager's reciprocity relationship (4th law of thermodynamics), which holds at steady states close to thermodynamic equilibrium. The principle of internal entropy compensation is in addition to, and implies, the principle of minimum entropy production and may even be valid in regimes far from thermodynamic equilibrium.
He had some very interesting things to say about TIME in his work and Nobel Prize speech. I think they are key to understanding circadian biology and timing. All of our time reversible equations in physics created by Newton, Einstein, and Schrödinger describe a simplification of what actually occurs in nature. We live our lives with eyes blinkered, dismissing reality as the exception to our neatly formed approximations of what time really is.
nobelprize.org

19. The internal balance of entropy production means that the system maintains its organized heterogeneity or dynamic order. It is in turn dependent on energy flow being symmetrically coupled and cyclically closed over the system as a whole. In other words, it depends on the validity of Onsager's reciprocity relationship in systems far from thermodynamic equilibrium, as argued above.
Time is a critical issue for dissipative systems. While most current thermodynamical analyses in biology completely ignore space-time structure, the “thermodynamics of organized complexity” applying to living systems depends WHOLLY on space-time heterogeneity, which allows ‘free’ variation of microscopic states within macroscopic constraints. THIS DEFINES WHAT A MITOCHONDRIA WAS DESIGNED TO DO AND TO BE IN A VARYING EMF FIELD CREATED ON THIS PLANET by the sun. Look at Lane's latest iteration of his own theories. He is moving toward Uncle Jack's perspective now.

20. The dynamic, energetic closure of the living system proposed built by Nature in cells gives rise to a number of important consequences. First and foremost, it frees the organism from the immediate constraints of energy conservation — the first law — as well as the second law of thermodynamics, thus offering a solution to the enigma of the organism posed by Lord Kelvin and Schrödinger.
Because of the atomic organization of cells (AMO physics) there is always energy available within the system. The energy derived from the sun is stored coherently, and ready for use, over all space-time domains. Mitochondrial water production is critical in the blueprint.
The fidelity of this water creation is the basis of the autonomy of organisms. Organisms are never simply at the mercy of their environments on account of the coherent energy stored. When the environment steals this ability from cells (nnEMF) cells are at the mercy of food and exercise.
More to the point, we don't have to eat constantly (Leptin Rx), leaving plenty of time for other useful, pleasurable activities (SEX).
The other consequences are that the organism is exquisitely sensitive and free from the mechanical constraints of life on Earth; and satisfies, at least, some of the basic conditions for quantum coherence. Water provides that as well.

21. Liquid water on Earth is quantum coherent even at ordinary temperatures and pressure. This is why Nature got the idea to build cells around liquid water. It is a naturally formed quantum computer functionally. Liquid water made in the mitochondrial matrix is the most wonderous chemical Nature has ever built because the water forms more coherent domains than the water from the hydrology cycle. Even latitude variation shows how water homogeneity changes as solar inclination affects its molecular arrangements and bond angles. Mitochondrial matrix water associates with macromolecules and membranes in cells into a gel-liquid crystalline configuration that enables enzymes and nucleic acids to function as quantum molecular machines that transform and transfer solar energy at close to 100% efficiency. Liquid crystalline water at interfaces also provides the excitation energy that enables it to split into hydrogen and oxygen in photosynthesis, simultaneously generating electricity for intercommunication and for the redox chemistry that ultimately powers the entire biosphere on the 3rd rock from the sun.
Water is the means, medium, and message of life, and it must be made in large quantities in your mitochondrial matrix to remain healthy. It has to be devoid of deuterium and must be made coherent using H+ exclusively. Any reduction in its production will lead to some chronic diseases.

22. Your experts are not going deep enough to solve the chronic disease epidemics. Decentralized medicine goes deep, and this is what the Age of Light aims to show you on March 16, 2024, in El Salvador. On the Ark, their leaders are looking for the right answers, not the one the globalists made sure was published in a biochemistry textbook to keep their power centralized in healthcare. @twocitizenships @nayibbukele