Recently, @ThePrintIndia published an article titled “real military account of Saragarhi” and harshly criticised the film Kesari. The article has been received with much applause among some political circles. Upon requests, I give a brief review of the article in this thread (1)
Of course, this is far from Truth. The Pashtun rebels were not anti-colonial freedom fighters. But why did they rebel in the first place? Let us look at the accounts of surveyors of contemporary late 19th century Pashtun population to find out the reason (3)
It is thus incorrect to characterise Pan Islamist frontier Pathan Jihadi rebels of 1897 Jihad as “anti colonial freedom fighters”(9)
The article points out several factually incorrect myths floated by the film and rightly so. Myth such as "10,000 pathan invaders"(when their real number was close to 1000-1500) and Kesari turbans (sepoys had no Kesari turbans).But it is selectively silent on few other myths (10)
For instance, the article is completely silent on the factually incorrect myth of Sikh Saragarhi soldiers building a Mosque, which was floated by the film Kesari, when in reality they actively destroyed mosques throughout the campaign(11)
End.
End.
Just one year before these incidents, Pathans and their King on the other side of Durand line invaded "Kafiristan",which was a small, isolated region in the Northeast of today's Afghanistan
Those Kafirs were brave warriors but their primitive weapons were no match to Pathan guns
Those Kafirs were brave warriors but their primitive weapons were no match to Pathan guns
As a result,'Kafiristan' became 'Nuristan'. Not a single Nuristani Kafir exists today in Afghanistan. A few of those who fled to Chitral retain their native religion.
With this context and perspective, it is easy to see why Pathans on this side of Durand line did what they did
With this context and perspective, it is easy to see why Pathans on this side of Durand line did what they did
Loading suggestions...