بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
One of the confusing things about Evolutionary theory is how to accommodate the development of a majority of creatures settling on only 2 reproductive genders.
Thread Day 3 & 4. Greater Signs: Male & Female
One of the confusing things about Evolutionary theory is how to accommodate the development of a majority of creatures settling on only 2 reproductive genders.
Thread Day 3 & 4. Greater Signs: Male & Female
Biology books have life starting as asexual single celled organisms known as ameoba, evolving into transitory organisms, and eventually into amphibians, reptiles, mammals, and eventually humans. Yet they never describe how exactly when or how male and female sexes originated.
The evolution of sex is not a topic evolutionary biologists like to discuss, bc no matter how many theories they make they still have the huge hurdle of how the first fully functioning male and female necessary to begin the process came about. Some have stated the following:
Other evolutionary biologists have described the evolution of binary sexes as a reversal in efficiency from previously asexual reproduction our single celled ancestors evolved from, in their view. This is bc asexual reproduction, the organism just copies it's chromosomes, but w/
sexual reproduction, each sex has to supply the exact complementary # of chromosomes to match with the opp sex (23 for humans). In producing large complex organisms, sexual reproduction has been the favored path, which confuses them altogether bc
the theory would have to account not only for sexual reproduction, but simultaneous evolution of a female member of a species that's equipped to nourish an embryo and a male member that produces n supplies mobile sperm cells. They've come up w/ 4 main theories ea. w/ their holes
Their names are The lottery Principle, the Tangled Bank Hypothesis, the Red Queen Hypothesis, and the DNA Repair Hypothesis. For the sake of length I won't go into them, but if anyone's interested in it, here's a good source on details:
In summary, in an evolutionary perspective sex is not only unnecessary, but detrimental to the process. They proposed it evolved to purge bad genes, yet mutations are known to be rarely beneficial. As a result, other evolutionists argue at this proposal:
It's a very tough topic to summarize, but I've highlighted some weaknesses in Darwinian Evolutionary Theory before shown below, n ultimately they're just men guessing at the unseen. There are Facts within the theory but as an explanation of source of life it's very much lacking.
Previous thread on weaknesses in the theory:
On the other hand, a Creator has created what He wills to have sexes. He's placed pleasure and reward in pursuing the reproduction to motivate us to reproduce. Imagine if the process wasn't enjoyable, from a survival of the fittest perspective, kids are a weakness and a burden.
And hinder chances of survival, on top of the process having no good feeling, but just a pure exchange of gametes to reproduce. Few humans would genuinely feel the motivation to reproduce if we were as aimless and stoic as the theory suggests.
Relevant Quran verses:
"And of His signs is that He created for you from yourselves mates that you may find tranquillity in them; and He placed between you affection and mercy. Indeed in that are signs for a people who give thought." (Q30:21)
"And of His signs is that He created for you from yourselves mates that you may find tranquillity in them; and He placed between you affection and mercy. Indeed in that are signs for a people who give thought." (Q30:21)
"O mankind! We have created you from a male and a female, and made you into nations and tribes, that you may know one another..."(Q49:13)
"And we created you in pairs." (Q78:8)
RT, bless up!
📖🚶🏾♂️
"And we created you in pairs." (Q78:8)
RT, bless up!
📖🚶🏾♂️
Loading suggestions...