Anand Jagannath
Anand Jagannath

@AnandJag1

17 Tweets 108 reads May 26, 2020
My team recently asked WHY we give Fe to pts with HFrEF+anemia.
First answer: b/c someone told me so
Better answer: let me get back to you on that
Let’s explore and try to understand, #medtwitter #medstudenttwitter 0/14
1/First off, it helps to review a general schema for anemia.
Blood loss, decreased production, increased destruction
So, why are patients with HFrEF anemic?
2/Controlling for other co-morbids or meds that can lead to blood loss and destruction, it turns out that ↓RBC production drives anemia in HFrEF.
Why?
3/Turns out all these factors play a role! Some brief specifics:
Inflamm -> ↑hepcidin -> ↑sequestration ↓gut absorp
Dilution (acute exacerbation)
↓Fe (hepcidin)
CKD (EPO stimulation from ↓renal pO2 blocked by inflamm)
Graphic (bit.ly)
4/The ACE-i bit confused me. Rabbit hole summary:
ACE nlly ↑RBCs through several pathways
ACE-i gets in the way by ↑goralatide, ↓IGF-1, and ↓IL-12 -> ↓RBCs
Clinically significant? Maybe, but still debated. I need a kidney doc.
@kidneyboy @NephJC help!
5/Phew, ok let’s uncross our eyes and do a quick recap:
So far we know that HFrEF -> multifactorial anemia. Inflammation probably leading the charge of ↓production.
Inflammation -> ↑hepcidin -> ↓available Fe ->↓Hb
6/This isn’t your everyday Fe-def anemia though.
Hepcidin is sequestering Fe in the liver and macrophages so we actually HAVE Fe, we just can’t use it -> FUNCTIONAL Fe deficiency.
Cool, so it’ll show up on Fe studies, right?
Sorta…
7/The studies are a little tricky.
Normal Fe-def -> ↓Fe, ferritin, %sat; ↑TIBC
Fe-def in HFrEF -> ferritin <100 OR ferritin 100-299 + Tsat <20%
This criteria tries to account for ↑ferritin in inflammation (and used by all the Fe def+HF trials)
8/K, so we know Fe-def in HFrEF is functional and we can detect it. Why do we treat it?
These pts have ↓NYHA/exercise, QoL, and ↑mortality (bit.ly)
Here’s the kicker: pts don’t have to be anemic! The Fe-def alone does it
9/Yikes! How do we treat it this? First thought was correct the anemia with ESAs. A little history:
In 2000, 142 pts in Tel Aviv w/anemia+HFrEF were given darbopoietin+Fe ->↑NYHA fxnl class.
Darbo was made king and tons of ESA trials followed.
10/The RED-HF trial was the biggest study of darbo v placebo in pts w/ HFrEF+anemia (2278 pts, rndmizd, dbl-blnd).
Sadly, death and hospitalization didn’t improve, AND there were ↑strokes and thromboembolic events.
Darbo was done.
11/But, a small study of 16 pts w/HFrEF+anemia that gave IV Fe alone was published just before RED-HF.
-> ↑NYHA class, Hb, and QoL! bit.ly
Great! We may be able to answer the, “why” of Fe rx in HFrEF.
12/Oral vs IV?
IRON-OUT (oral Fe v placebo): no ∆ in VO2max, 6MWD, ntBNP
Most studies are IV Fe b/c presumed poor PO absorp from ↑hepcidin. Findings: ↑QoL, 6MWD, NYHA
Meta-analyses (IV Fe) -> ↓hospitalizations+CV mortality+ntBNP+↑QoL
IV Fe wins.
13/Quick note on HFpEF
The jury is still out as to whether Fe replacement helps. The FAIR-HF-HFpEF study is currently recruiting pts to try to answer this question (clinicaltrials.gov)
14/Summary
💥HFrEF is an inflammatory state -> fxnl Fe-deficiency via hepcidin
💥↓Fe worsens outcomes in HFrEF
💥ESAs don’t help, make things worse
💥IV Fe helps! Give it!
15/Big thanks to @noahrosenberg1 and @DoctorVig’s recent #tweetorial convo for nudging me to make this.
I learned a ton and realized there’s a ton left to learn. @cardionerds @myanamandala @SalKumarMD @ceciliaberard10, #cardiotwitter, teach us more!
Fin/

Loading suggestions...