#Intercastemarriages are propagated as a taboo by the some hard liners and extremists. However, there are evidences of intercaste marriages from Indian history.
pl read on Small #thread on #intercastemarriage from Indian antiquity.
#tweet4bharat
1/7
pl read on Small #thread on #intercastemarriage from Indian antiquity.
#tweet4bharat
1/7
Gupta's Poona Copper Plate inscriptions states that Samudragupta’s son Chandragupta II ruled from c. 375- 415 A.D. He had a queen named Kubernaga, of Naga lineage, and from this marriage was born Prabhavatigupta.
csirs.org.in
2/7
csirs.org.in
2/7
The Poona copper plate epigraphs also inform that the daughter Prabhavatigupta was married to VAKATAKAS prince Rudrasena II, s/o Prithvishena I of Deccan in 380AD
After death of Chandragupta, Prabhavati administered VATAKAS empire brilliantly untill maturity of her two sons
3/7
After death of Chandragupta, Prabhavati administered VATAKAS empire brilliantly untill maturity of her two sons
3/7
Parihar/Pratihar/Padiyar Rajaputras finds earliest mention in Jodhpur Inscription of Bauka Parihar dtd 837 CE, that also explains the name of the clan. The clan finds origin from a Brahmin wife and Bhadra Kshatriya
rajputcommunity.in
4/7
rajputcommunity.in
4/7
7th Century, A Bengal inscription ascribes a Brahmin father married a Shudra mother and the off-springs were called Parashava.
6/7
6/7
The threaded incidences of intercaste marriages from eminent families & clans are recorded & survived few over a period of time. Since, #intercastemarriage was never a social issued in families of repute. We may consider that this was neither an issue in lower strata.
EOT
7/7
EOT
7/7
Loading suggestions...