π§΅Short Thread:πͺ‘
π· βWhat is an ad hominem?β
π I delete my tweets so if you want to keep this then either archive or take notes.
β¬οΈβ¬οΈβ¬οΈβ¬οΈβ¬οΈβ¬οΈβ¬οΈβ¬οΈβ¬οΈβ¬οΈ
π· βWhat is an ad hominem?β
π I delete my tweets so if you want to keep this then either archive or take notes.
β¬οΈβ¬οΈβ¬οΈβ¬οΈβ¬οΈβ¬οΈβ¬οΈβ¬οΈβ¬οΈβ¬οΈ
I keep seeing people misuse the term βad hominemβ.
What is it?
β It refers specifically to a line of reasoning that uses a personal attack as a premise within the argument as a reason to accept a conclusion.
For example:
What is it?
β It refers specifically to a line of reasoning that uses a personal attack as a premise within the argument as a reason to accept a conclusion.
For example:
P1 - this persons is a smelly idiot.
ββββββββββββ
C - you shouldnβt believe their argument.
β This is an ad hominem
βHowever an insult that is not given as a premise in an argument but merely accompanies an argument, is not an as hominem.
For example:
ββββββββββββ
C - you shouldnβt believe their argument.
β This is an ad hominem
βHowever an insult that is not given as a premise in an argument but merely accompanies an argument, is not an as hominem.
For example:
βIβm now going to refute this douche bag....β
P1 - A > B
P2 - A
ββββββββββββ
C - B
βThis is not an ad hominem. Itβs bad etiquette at most.
πThe key distinction is:
β in the 1st argument the insult was one of the reasons to accept the conclusion
β in the 2nd it wasnβt
P1 - A > B
P2 - A
ββββββββββββ
C - B
βThis is not an ad hominem. Itβs bad etiquette at most.
πThe key distinction is:
β in the 1st argument the insult was one of the reasons to accept the conclusion
β in the 2nd it wasnβt
Loading suggestions...