Rate Control versus Rhythm Control for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) after Cardiac Surgery. Which strategy is better for new post-operative AF? An interesting study published @NEJM @XavierPrida @USFIMres
#cardiotwitter #CardioEd #MedTwitter #arrhythmia
#cardiotwitter #CardioEd #MedTwitter #arrhythmia
Background:
- Post-op AF remains most common complication after cardiac surgery, incidence ~20-50%
- Annual cost of treating post-op AF and its sequelae ~$1 billion/year
- Complications on patients/healthcare system: increased rates of death, hospitalizations, inflated costs
- Post-op AF remains most common complication after cardiac surgery, incidence ~20-50%
- Annual cost of treating post-op AF and its sequelae ~$1 billion/year
- Complications on patients/healthcare system: increased rates of death, hospitalizations, inflated costs
End-Points:
-Primary: Total number of days in hospital (including ER visits) within 60 days of randomization
- Secondary: length of index hospitalization, readmission, need for permanent placement of pacemaker, rates of death/adverse events, eligibility for d/c based on AF
-Primary: Total number of days in hospital (including ER visits) within 60 days of randomization
- Secondary: length of index hospitalization, readmission, need for permanent placement of pacemaker, rates of death/adverse events, eligibility for d/c based on AF
Conclusion:
- No overall significant difference b/w treatment strategies w/ respect to primary end-point
- @ACCinTouch @American_Heart @HRSonline support beta-blockers for AF as first-line therapy in stable patients
- Similar rates of post-op AF ≥ 60 days in rate/rhythm control
- No overall significant difference b/w treatment strategies w/ respect to primary end-point
- @ACCinTouch @American_Heart @HRSonline support beta-blockers for AF as first-line therapy in stable patients
- Similar rates of post-op AF ≥ 60 days in rate/rhythm control
Loading suggestions...