A provider has to provide something before he can have sex with a woman. He has to 'prove' himself and work hard for some pussy. If you feel a woman is making you wait it is because she views you as a provider.
A lover simply has to communicate his attraction towards a woman and he'll be fucking her in no time if she is attracted to him. A lover goes through much less stress.
Believe it or not, the sexually attractive man is more valuable to a woman on a biological level; the lover. He's attractive in that his genes are important to her for procreation and thus his value outweighs the social attractiveness of the provider.
Additionally there are many men with a high social value. There is always serious competition amongst providers because everyone is already offering her money or support in one form or another. They end up as her friends or are made to wait to be her boyfriend/husband
Lovers have less competition. Very few men are bold enough to offer sex for sex to a woman as men haven't been taught to value their sexuality or recognize sexuality in women.
The lover is able to have fast sex with women without paying for numerous dates and/or providing. Providers majorly get sex when they're in monogamous relationships whereby the woman is the Prize and he is the chaser.
There is of course a balance between the two and if you wish to be long term with a woman you must display 80% lover traits and 20% provider traits.
Majority of men in the world have less than 10 sexual partners and thus have less experience with being lovers
Which side would you prefer to lean more into?
Provider or lover?
Which side would you prefer to lean more into?
Provider or lover?
Loading suggestions...