@Nikihara21 @DefiledGod Why just Trishula? I can show Allah from Upanishads and claim Allah is vedic. In-fact, Allopanishad is named after Allah.
Clearly,I am quoting a historian's perspective in this tweet. For any historian and linguist, only the older Mukhya Upanishads form part of Vedic literature

@Nikihara21 @DefiledGod Not one historian worth his salt considers Mahopanishad as a part of Vedic canon. Not Ollivelle. Not Signe. Not PV Kane. They all consider it a post Buddhist early CE Upanishad.
Of course, a religious theologian will disagree. From religious perspective, every Upanishad is Veda

@Nikihara21 @DefiledGod From the religious perspective, every Upanishad comes from the mouth of Brahma.
However, this is not the perspective of every Sampradaya. The Mimamsa Darshana considers the Dharmakanda (Samhita+Brahmana) to be above Brahmakanda (Upanishads etc).

@Nikihara21 @DefiledGod Why not quote Shula from Veda Samhitas. Why not from Mukhya Upanishad? Why could he find this reference only in a late Upanishad that scholars consider to be of post Buddhist age.
This proves my point. No Shula in Vedic literature as known to historians.