@FillmoreWhite @AristotleMrs @Robert76907841 @NonlinearDarren @RobMeekel @Data79504085 @B_Bolshevik100 @JohnDublin10 @EricWil06256732 @Climatehope2 @glinch72 @Mark_A_Lunn @BridgetHolmstro @S_D_Mannix @PaulAtBillabong @BrknMan @Willard1951 @Stephen90045069 @TWTThisIsNow @Ceist8 @FChecker76 @dan613 @ammocrypta @flyonthewall182 @GregTruman4 @Jaisans @GregCoo85844909 @25_cycle @don85375 @ZSRenn @1tsakeeper @LizHersch1 @KCTaz @JustThi30117912 @gregchoat @Anvndarnamn5 @NickMcGinley1 @cieloyla @EthonRaptor @BradPKeyes @JSegor @jwickers @0Sundance @PeterMayfitz @omahas @TonyBoloni8 @TheDisproof @DanCady @Keeper_86 @NatGeo That's article is nonsense. I LIVE IN that mid-Atlantic region, just outside the "City of Oaks." My yard and town are full of healthy, magnificent oak trees. They are not dying.
I showed you a robust, peer-reviewed study about the large benefits of eCO2 for oaks. It's 1 of many.
I showed you a robust, peer-reviewed study about the large benefits of eCO2 for oaks. It's 1 of many.
@FillmoreWhite @AristotleMrs @Robert76907841 @NonlinearDarren @RobMeekel @Data79504085 @B_Bolshevik100 @JohnDublin10 @EricWil06256732 @Climatehope2 @glinch72 @Mark_A_Lunn @BridgetHolmstro @S_D_Mannix @PaulAtBillabong @BrknMan @Willard1951 @Stephen90045069 @TWTThisIsNow @Ceist8 @FChecker76 @dan613 @ammocrypta @flyonthewall182 @GregTruman4 @Jaisans @GregCoo85844909 @25_cycle @don85375 @ZSRenn @1tsakeeper @LizHersch1 @KCTaz @JustThi30117912 @gregchoat @Anvndarnamn5 @NickMcGinley1 @cieloyla @EthonRaptor @BradPKeyes @JSegor @jwickers @0Sundance @PeterMayfitz @omahas @TonyBoloni8 @TheDisproof @DanCady @Keeper_86 @NatGeo Here's a 2018 study. They measured effect of 50% elevation of CO2 (400 β 600 ppmv), in six species of oak. eCO2 increased growth in all six species, by percentages ranging from 9% to 120%. They also documented significantly improved water use efficiency.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
@FillmoreWhite @AristotleMrs @Robert76907841 @NonlinearDarren @RobMeekel @Data79504085 @B_Bolshevik100 @JohnDublin10 @EricWil06256732 @Climatehope2 @glinch72 @Mark_A_Lunn @BridgetHolmstro @S_D_Mannix @PaulAtBillabong @BrknMan @Willard1951 @Stephen90045069 @TWTThisIsNow @Ceist8 @FChecker76 @dan613 @ammocrypta @flyonthewall182 @GregTruman4 @Jaisans @GregCoo85844909 @25_cycle @don85375 @ZSRenn @1tsakeeper @LizHersch1 @KCTaz @JustThi30117912 @gregchoat @Anvndarnamn5 @NickMcGinley1 @cieloyla @EthonRaptor @BradPKeyes @JSegor @jwickers @0Sundance @PeterMayfitz @omahas @TonyBoloni8 @TheDisproof @DanCady @Keeper_86 @NatGeo Direct impacts of warming are obviously insignificant. From the map you can see 1Β°C (1.8Β°F) = only 50-70 miles latitude change.
Hansen/GISS reported a similar figure:
"warming of 0.5Β°Cβ¦ implies typically a poleward shift of isotherms by 50 to 75 kmβ¦"
sealevel.info
Hansen/GISS reported a similar figure:
"warming of 0.5Β°Cβ¦ implies typically a poleward shift of isotherms by 50 to 75 kmβ¦"
sealevel.info
@FillmoreWhite @AristotleMrs @Robert76907841 @NonlinearDarren @RobMeekel @Data79504085 @B_Bolshevik100 @JohnDublin10 @EricWil06256732 @Climatehope2 @glinch72 @Mark_A_Lunn @BridgetHolmstro @S_D_Mannix @PaulAtBillabong @BrknMan @Willard1951 @Stephen90045069 @TWTThisIsNow @Ceist8 @FChecker76 @dan613 @ammocrypta @flyonthewall182 @GregTruman4 @Jaisans @GregCoo85844909 @25_cycle @don85375 @ZSRenn @1tsakeeper @LizHersch1 @KCTaz @JustThi30117912 @gregchoat @Anvndarnamn5 @NickMcGinley1 @cieloyla @EthonRaptor @BradPKeyes @JSegor @jwickers @0Sundance @PeterMayfitz @omahas @TonyBoloni8 @TheDisproof @DanCady @Keeper_86 @NatGeo Pick any species of oak, look up its range, and the corresponding growing zone temperatures. It will be immediately obvious that a 0.5Β°C or 1Β°C temperature change is completely insignificant.
Here's one:
sealevel.info
Here's one:
sealevel.info
@FillmoreWhite @AristotleMrs @Robert76907841 @NonlinearDarren @RobMeekel @Data79504085 @B_Bolshevik100 @JohnDublin10 @EricWil06256732 @Climatehope2 @glinch72 @Mark_A_Lunn @BridgetHolmstro @S_D_Mannix @PaulAtBillabong @BrknMan @Willard1951 @Stephen90045069 @TWTThisIsNow @Ceist8 @FChecker76 @dan613 @ammocrypta @flyonthewall182 @GregTruman4 @Jaisans @GregCoo85844909 @25_cycle @don85375 @ZSRenn @1tsakeeper @LizHersch1 @KCTaz @JustThi30117912 @gregchoat @Anvndarnamn5 @NickMcGinley1 @cieloyla @EthonRaptor @BradPKeyes @JSegor @jwickers @0Sundance @PeterMayfitz @omahas @TonyBoloni8 @TheDisproof @DanCady @Keeper_86 @NatGeo You made 5 guesses, of crops/plants that you supposed wouldn't benefit from eCO2. ALL 5 are proven wrong by robust, peer-reviewed studies, of which you were apparently unaware.
Why do climate activists just make stuff up? Why don't you care about science?
Why do climate activists just make stuff up? Why don't you care about science?
@FillmoreWhite @AristotleMrs @Robert76907841 @NonlinearDarren @RobMeekel @Data79504085 @B_Bolshevik100 @JohnDublin10 @EricWil06256732 @Climatehope2 @glinch72 @Mark_A_Lunn @BridgetHolmstro @S_D_Mannix @PaulAtBillabong @BrknMan @Willard1951 @Stephen90045069 @TWTThisIsNow @Ceist8 @FChecker76 @dan613 @ammocrypta @flyonthewall182 @GregTruman4 @Jaisans @GregCoo85844909 @25_cycle @don85375 @ZSRenn @1tsakeeper @LizHersch1 @KCTaz @JustThi30117912 @gregchoat @Anvndarnamn5 @NickMcGinley1 @cieloyla @EthonRaptor @BradPKeyes @JSegor @jwickers @0Sundance @PeterMayfitz @omahas @TonyBoloni8 @TheDisproof @DanCady @Rattibha @ThreadReaderApp unroll/compile
Loading suggestions...