ALL Major Royal Dynasties have Eponymous Ancestors:—
• Chalukya
• Pallava
• Satavahana
• Rudra Kadamba
• Rashtrakuta, Ratta, Tunga
• Shilahara
• Yadu/Seunachandra
• HoySala
• Sinda
• Nala
• Guhilot
• Nikambha
& Many More.
• Chalukya
• Pallava
• Satavahana
• Rudra Kadamba
• Rashtrakuta, Ratta, Tunga
• Shilahara
• Yadu/Seunachandra
• HoySala
• Sinda
• Nala
• Guhilot
• Nikambha
& Many More.
• The Chalukyas get their name from Raja Chalukya, born in the Chuluk (Palm) of Brahma, to annihilate Asuras.
• Satyakin Kshitipala dynasty known popularly as Rashtrakutas, also Rattas & Tungas get their name from not one but THREE generations of their illustrious ancestry...
• Satyakin Kshitipala dynasty known popularly as Rashtrakutas, also Rattas & Tungas get their name from not one but THREE generations of their illustrious ancestry...
...
Tunga was the father of Rashtra (Ratta being the prakrit form), who was father of Rashtrakuta whose name is the most popular reference to their clan, though Ratta and Tunga continued to be used right until end of their imperial regime and even beyond by various branches...
Tunga was the father of Rashtra (Ratta being the prakrit form), who was father of Rashtrakuta whose name is the most popular reference to their clan, though Ratta and Tunga continued to be used right until end of their imperial regime and even beyond by various branches...
...
• Satavahana was the son of Guhyaka/Yaksha Sata and a Rishi's daughter, adopted into the royal dynasty of Raja Dvipakarni, who may likely have belonged to the ancient Andhra warrior tribe of Andhra Maval, explaining the Pauranik attribution of Satavahanas as "Andhras"...
• Satavahana was the son of Guhyaka/Yaksha Sata and a Rishi's daughter, adopted into the royal dynasty of Raja Dvipakarni, who may likely have belonged to the ancient Andhra warrior tribe of Andhra Maval, explaining the Pauranik attribution of Satavahanas as "Andhras"...
...
• Pallavas get their name from son of Maharathi Ashwathamma, sired with his Naga queen-wife, named Pallava.
• Kadambas from a general consensus of their many inscriptions get their name from a human form of the Trilochana Rudra aspect of Shiva named as "Rudra Kadamba"...
• Pallavas get their name from son of Maharathi Ashwathamma, sired with his Naga queen-wife, named Pallava.
• Kadambas from a general consensus of their many inscriptions get their name from a human form of the Trilochana Rudra aspect of Shiva named as "Rudra Kadamba"...
...
• Shilahara (Stone-Placed Oblation) was the title of Vidyadhara Prince Jimutavahana who heroically offered to sacrifice his life to save a Naga prince as a food offering to Garuda Deva by famously lying down upon a stone altar. The story is covered in the Drama Nagananda...
• Shilahara (Stone-Placed Oblation) was the title of Vidyadhara Prince Jimutavahana who heroically offered to sacrifice his life to save a Naga prince as a food offering to Garuda Deva by famously lying down upon a stone altar. The story is covered in the Drama Nagananda...
...
• Yadavas obviously get their names from the legendary Somavanshi King Yadu already but the Yadavrayas of Devagiri got the unnecessary epithet of Seuna and Seunavansha (though NOT self-boasted) from their famous king Seundachandra which has become popular in academia now...
• Yadavas obviously get their names from the legendary Somavanshi King Yadu already but the Yadavrayas of Devagiri got the unnecessary epithet of Seuna and Seunavansha (though NOT self-boasted) from their famous king Seundachandra which has become popular in academia now...
• HoySala, properly known as Sala Yadava was a prince of the SAME Yadava Kutumba as the one ruling in Devagiri and other regions of Maharashtra.
He received prefix Hoy (Striker) after striking down a lion or a tiger with a Rod. PoyeSala is another variant meaning Rod-Striker.
He received prefix Hoy (Striker) after striking down a lion or a tiger with a Rod. PoyeSala is another variant meaning Rod-Striker.
The Phanirājavanshi/Bhujagendravanshi Sinda/Shindes received their name from Raja Sinda, born to Nagaraja Dharanindra near the Sindhu & raised by the Naga King on diet of "tigress-milk". A more elaborated version makes Sindaraja born from Shiva & Sindhu a boon to Dharanindra.
Nalas recieved their name from the famous Nishadh Raja Nala, husband of Maharani Damayanti.
Guhilots recieved their name from Guhila, posthumous son of Ikshvakuvanshi Maharaja Vijayabhupa, at Nashik-Trymbak.
Nikams/Nikambs receieved their name from Ikshvakuvanshi Raja Nikumbha.
Guhilots recieved their name from Guhila, posthumous son of Ikshvakuvanshi Maharaja Vijayabhupa, at Nashik-Trymbak.
Nikams/Nikambs receieved their name from Ikshvakuvanshi Raja Nikumbha.
...
There are many more such examples. The final point to be driven home is is that in Dakshinapatha, ALL Ruling class has ALWAYS BEEN of civilized highborn Dynasties locked in their own endogamous circles.
No peasantry, no other caste-communities are part of this Aristocracy.
There are many more such examples. The final point to be driven home is is that in Dakshinapatha, ALL Ruling class has ALWAYS BEEN of civilized highborn Dynasties locked in their own endogamous circles.
No peasantry, no other caste-communities are part of this Aristocracy.
These rulers, intermarrying among the Kshatriya folds, maintaining their divine right to rule, have NO legitimate bloodline connection to anyone outside of their endogamous circles.
One CANNOT be related to them just because they patronised some books in one's language.
One CANNOT be related to them just because they patronised some books in one's language.
Nor does speaking the same language or owning a shack near their old castles or having similar names, make these Kings one's ancestors.
Godless armchair "historians" use atheistic theories & mental gymnastics to reject the official Rulers' Statements, to obfuscate their glory...
Godless armchair "historians" use atheistic theories & mental gymnastics to reject the official Rulers' Statements, to obfuscate their glory...
...
Everything is twisted to imply that so-and-so dynasty was actually of upstart peasants, that so-and-so dynasty forged this or that.
There those who did not even know ancient Shāstras or Sociology or Sanskrit as a whole who dabbled nonstop in misinterpreting inscriptions...
Everything is twisted to imply that so-and-so dynasty was actually of upstart peasants, that so-and-so dynasty forged this or that.
There those who did not even know ancient Shāstras or Sociology or Sanskrit as a whole who dabbled nonstop in misinterpreting inscriptions...
...
This is done to accommodate subaltern egos to invest them in the narrative of past.
There are only a handful of historians on ancient India who are not Sub-Altern IDPOL fuelers & peddlers in India. The very acclaim of others came from distributing royal glory to subalterns.
This is done to accommodate subaltern egos to invest them in the narrative of past.
There are only a handful of historians on ancient India who are not Sub-Altern IDPOL fuelers & peddlers in India. The very acclaim of others came from distributing royal glory to subalterns.
Even the Imperial Guptas recieved their clan name "Gupta" from their Eponymous Ancestor Shri Gupta/Gutta, Father of Maharaja Ghatotkacha Gupta who established the Gupta Dynasty.
There is ZERO relation of Vaishya-prescribed suffix of 'Gupta' to the Kshatriya Imperial Guptas.
There is ZERO relation of Vaishya-prescribed suffix of 'Gupta' to the Kshatriya Imperial Guptas.
Loading suggestions...