Responding to the open distorter of Islam, Justin Parrott ๐ฆ
Thread ๐งต
1) The agreement of nation states has no legal implications on the Shariah, as the creation of these nation states contradicts the Shariah and the ummah had agreed on the permissibility of slavery for 1400
Thread ๐งต
1) The agreement of nation states has no legal implications on the Shariah, as the creation of these nation states contradicts the Shariah and the ummah had agreed on the permissibility of slavery for 1400
Years. Further, nation states only represent members of their nation, so what about Muslims who aren't part of these nations?
2) The prophet ๏ทบ encouraging the freedom of individual slaves doesn't establish an encouragement to free all slaves, just as encouraging to eat less
2) The prophet ๏ทบ encouraging the freedom of individual slaves doesn't establish an encouragement to free all slaves, just as encouraging to eat less
Doesn't mean encouragement to abandon eating in its entirety. Further, there were occasions where the Prophet ๏ทบ discouraged freeing slaves. Consider the prophet ๏ทบ cancelled the freedom of a slave, how does this fit with abolishing slavery?
The prophet ๏ทบ also made it clear that gifting a slave to someone is sometimes better than freeing the salve. What will you say, that family ties are more important than freeing slaves? That a man getting service (maybe even sexual) is better than a persons freedom? You can't
Reconcile any of this with what Justin is trying to preach.
3) humanizing slaves doesn't abolish slavery. The very fact you're humanizing a category means that category exists.
4) most say jihad can only be waged with a leader, however this isn't agreed. Further what Justin
3) humanizing slaves doesn't abolish slavery. The very fact you're humanizing a category means that category exists.
4) most say jihad can only be waged with a leader, however this isn't agreed. Further what Justin
Won't tell you is how easy it is to appoint a leader. It's very literally a matter of pledging allegiance to someone who fulfils the criteria in the absence of an existing leader, so in principle Muslims in America could appoint for themselves a leader... Not to mention from a
Purely legal perspective the leadership of Abu bakr Al Baghdadi was more valid than the leadership of most Muslim rulers, so does Justin support the enslavement of the yazidis? Note I don't support isis, just pointing out the stupidity of his argument.
5) it is possible to aquire slaves legally, this is because like I discussed before Muslims could just appoint a leader but also the children of female slaves are slaves (unless through the master), as such slavery still exists in Mauritania. Not only that but arguably buying
Slaves from kuffar in darul harb, even if wrongly enslaved, would still count. Also back to the disobeying leaders, a Muslim women 10 years ago driving in Indonesia was disobeying Saudi ban on women driving, yet no one would say she did something sinful. This is because the
Jurisdiction of nation states only extends to the borders of their nations, they have no authority over people who aren't citizens. As such how would Muslims who aren't citizens of these tyrannical states be sinful for not obeying them?
6) treaties of nation states don't
6) treaties of nation states don't
Establish anything for those operating outside the nation state. Do kuffar imprison Muslim women? Yes. Are Muslim women often raped by kafir armies? Yes. So what exactly are you celebrating, that Muslims abandon the law? Not to mention when isis took slaves it resulted in how
Many Muslims being enslaved?
7) scholars of Al Azhar signing declarations that criminalizes the Sunnah only sign their apostasy, Muslim should not even give Salam to such kuffar let alone follow them.
8) Islam isn't a religion of peace it's a religion of tawhid that seeks to
7) scholars of Al Azhar signing declarations that criminalizes the Sunnah only sign their apostasy, Muslim should not even give Salam to such kuffar let alone follow them.
8) Islam isn't a religion of peace it's a religion of tawhid that seeks to
Enforce it's dominance on all.
Let's be honest Justin gave no real argument, and is only trying desperately to cope. I ask Muslims to reject anyone who says slavery is abolished and thats good. Someone who says such a thing is worse than a rapist who rapes his own daughter.
Let's be honest Justin gave no real argument, and is only trying desperately to cope. I ask Muslims to reject anyone who says slavery is abolished and thats good. Someone who says such a thing is worse than a rapist who rapes his own daughter.
Loading suggestions...