✅Contract happened at 6 but consummation happened 3 years later when she attained physical maturity. Plus this employs the fallacy of presentism.
✅Report is not authentic
✅The tribe was charged with treason and this ruling was based upon the Jewish law which they accepted

✅ Ka‘b ibn Ashraf wasn’t an innocent person. If you read the stories you’d understand he was writing poetry against Muslims and travelled to Makkah to incite the Quraysh leaders against the Muslims
✅ In an Islamic state, there’s a socio-political context to the ruling

✅Expansion of an empire by conquering different lands which was done by almost all empires.
Also, posting these arguments like a shotgun tactic doesn’t work since it appears as if there’s a coherent argument forumualted.
Lastly, all of these arguments are moral ones.

An objective moral anchor still needs to be provided to prove why these are wrong.
Still there isn’t a good argument made after 2 years being on this site. ☝🏻