India technically never had secularism but a version a harassment against Hindus while making sure Islam & Xtianity get to maintain their religious bubble.
Process is dehinduization of Hindu masses so that over 100 or 150 years these de-Hinduised masses can be absorbed by others.
Process is dehinduization of Hindu masses so that over 100 or 150 years these de-Hinduised masses can be absorbed by others.
From discriminatory laws to biased media the harassment against Hindus is quite obvious & even observed by many non-Indian commentators.
It's the sheer will of Hindus & theological superiority of Hinduism that this religion survives such institutionalized cleΞ±nsing.
It's the sheer will of Hindus & theological superiority of Hinduism that this religion survives such institutionalized cleΞ±nsing.
Karnataka Hijab controversy should be seen from this angle only: Secularists are supporting Hijab inside school while Hindus are demanding to continue the same uniform code.
Who is actually maintaining the secularism & who is actually advancing islΞ±mization of education space?
Who is actually maintaining the secularism & who is actually advancing islΞ±mization of education space?
It is pretty much obvious from the incident that Hindus are ready, in K'taka Hijab controversy, to cede the territory for the sake of common ground ie common uniform while Muslims are demanding a special privilege of having their will being imposed in education space.
Eventually Muslim side will win this issue bcz that is how Indian system is built. Not to preserve some so called dreaded version of secularism but to preserve the bubble of Abrahmics fundamentalism as well as to advance the size of that bubble at the expense of Hindus' rights.
Polarization is natural in India bcz it can't be stopped & that's bcz there are too many variables involved & institutions that are supposed to fight that polarization, like media, are the ones that hv weaponized it.
In the end the survival of the system depends on Hindus' mercy.
In the end the survival of the system depends on Hindus' mercy.
From a neutral perspective it's mind boggling to see that "secularists" are asking for Hijab inside school while "communal" Hindutvas are asking for a common ground ie to continue uniform.
English media literally has to do OTT haraminess to paint Hindus as bad guys in this.
English media literally has to do OTT haraminess to paint Hindus as bad guys in this.
But that is how media coverage has always been. One sided w/ mischaracterization of the issue.
I particularly have no problem if Muslim girls wear Hijab.
AAMoF from a Hindu point of view that is better for me bcz I'm an AryaPutra & that demarcation must remain at its best.
I particularly have no problem if Muslim girls wear Hijab.
AAMoF from a Hindu point of view that is better for me bcz I'm an AryaPutra & that demarcation must remain at its best.
Only reasoning I would ever want Hijab being banned inside school is security of children else there is no reason to oppose it. My reason is based on logical understanding while those Hindus who are asking for common uniform in K'taka are *REAL* Seculars. It's just that I'm not.
Loading suggestions...