West tried India & Hong Kong to fight their war against China.
They failed.
India engaged with China in Doklam & Ladhak. Stood eye to eye, even fought PLA in a hand to hand combat without weapons.
But, India refused to escalate beyond a point & convert it into a full-scale war
They failed.
India engaged with China in Doklam & Ladhak. Stood eye to eye, even fought PLA in a hand to hand combat without weapons.
But, India refused to escalate beyond a point & convert it into a full-scale war
Similarly, Church backed chaos that West tried their best to manufacture in Hong Kong just like Ukrainian Maidan Protest was brutally crushed by China.
West failed there too...
West failed there too...
Now they have gone back to their old bedmate - ISI. With mission to spread chaos in China. West finds India "not crazy enough" to fight their war as Pakis have been happily doing since their birth.
West hopes ISI would finally achieve their goal in Xinjiang & create Jihad 2.0.
West hopes ISI would finally achieve their goal in Xinjiang & create Jihad 2.0.
This is dangerous for India because as a payback ISI would demand economic rescue plus approvals to make it a Pan Northern Himalayan Jihad from Kashmir to Xinjiang. That's why Pak Army chief showed his willingness to take a pro-Western stand in Russia-Ukraine war recently.
Now, few may throw an argument that, for this very reason India should adopt a pro-West stand in the Russia-Ukraine war by dumping our long standing strategic relations with Moscow...
But, India would lose more in such scenario...
Because...
But, India would lose more in such scenario...
Because...
India fully on bed with West means:
1. A Pan OIC+Communist (Beijing+Moscow) alliance with Pakistan finally freed from Western influence and stronger in Afghanistan and focused in Kashmir...
1. A Pan OIC+Communist (Beijing+Moscow) alliance with Pakistan finally freed from Western influence and stronger in Afghanistan and focused in Kashmir...
2. India completely surrounded in Neighbourhood from Pakistan, China, even Bangladesh, Nepal, Burma..along with an extremely chaotic Kashmir.
3. Indian MIC would die an infant death as West prefers only customers, not partners.
4. Church conversion mafia in India would be BOSSY
3. Indian MIC would die an infant death as West prefers only customers, not partners.
4. Church conversion mafia in India would be BOSSY
5. Less space to manoeuvre in key sovereignty decisions like data security and localisation, Indian ownership of key sectors like retail, telecom, banking, insurance, agriculture, fertilizer, Pharma, IT etc. (which is anyways declining at a supersonic speed)
Only risk of standing by Indian national interest is short term economic impact. And occasional bloody news friendly days (like early 2000s). But, these are manageable. And India would emerge stronger like last time when West sanctioned India during Atal era ...
If West sanctions India this time, it would be the beginning of the end of Western World Order. 100%.
Elites in West would gain more with Chinese world dominance. That's why they are pushing Western leadership (their puppets) to take calls which will propel China on top.
Elites in West would gain more with Chinese world dominance. That's why they are pushing Western leadership (their puppets) to take calls which will propel China on top.
A strong Indian leadership which Modi is displaying as of now is not just good for India or subcontinent... it's extremely critical for world as a whole.
Three Eyed Evil+Corporations+CCP World Order would be hellish.
India holds the key.
Support a STRONG INDIA.
For humanity.
Three Eyed Evil+Corporations+CCP World Order would be hellish.
India holds the key.
Support a STRONG INDIA.
For humanity.
If you are an Indian,
DO NOT TRUST THE MEDIA.
Indian media is completely under Western control.
All sides.
Stay strong. Gods bless.
DO NOT TRUST THE MEDIA.
Indian media is completely under Western control.
All sides.
Stay strong. Gods bless.
Loading suggestions...