The snake 'defrauds' both the mother and infant, stealing the child's milk. Sometimes latching to the breast with its tail in the child's mouth, taking the nutrients and starving the child.
A strange variant comes from Giovanni
Francesco Poggio Bracciolini (1380-1459), who recounted a rumoured story of a cow who gave birth to a monstrous and deformed snake. The snake tangled and broke the cow's legs, drank its milks and disappeared into the wilderness.
Francesco Poggio Bracciolini (1380-1459), who recounted a rumoured story of a cow who gave birth to a monstrous and deformed snake. The snake tangled and broke the cow's legs, drank its milks and disappeared into the wilderness.
The main question then is why these stories exist at all? We have a few key ideas here:
- snakes are an ancient primate enemy
- snakes pose a risk to children and animals
- snakes are a classic mythological animal, both phallic and chthonic
- snakes are an ancient primate enemy
- snakes pose a risk to children and animals
- snakes are a classic mythological animal, both phallic and chthonic
A combination of these practical and spiritual/sexual fears may be at the root of the Suckling Serpent myth, but there's unlikely to be one grand narrative to explain everything.
Loading suggestions...