Christians produce atrocity stories like “they did human sacrifice” to justify massacres of the indigenous.
Christians killed about 100 million natives in North and South America alone. More “human sacrifice” has happened for the Christian god around rhe world than any other.
Christians killed about 100 million natives in North and South America alone. More “human sacrifice” has happened for the Christian god around rhe world than any other.
That "success" is superficial. A lot of people are suffering in the West. Drug abuse, psychiatric illness, broken homes, child abuse, this is the story of Western society today.
Christian fundamentalist bigots aren't any less evil than Islamist ones.
This is the attitude that led Christians to murder and enslave millions. As a native chief said, by the behavior of Christians it is clear the Christian god is not superior.
This is the attitude that led Christians to murder and enslave millions. As a native chief said, by the behavior of Christians it is clear the Christian god is not superior.
And why is Christian slaughter of heathens "in the name of the Christian god" superior to a rare ritual sacrifice, done in a sacred ceremony by some indigenous group?
Slaughter by Christians comes from bigotry. It's worse.
Slaughter by Christians comes from bigotry. It's worse.
"A tree is known by its fruit."
Christians will be judged not by their homilies but by your actions of genocide, of slavery, of colonization.
And these comes from the doctrine of Christian supremacy, that they have the "one true god", others are evil.
Christians will be judged not by their homilies but by your actions of genocide, of slavery, of colonization.
And these comes from the doctrine of Christian supremacy, that they have the "one true god", others are evil.
The highest religious authority of Christians authorized colonization in the name of the Christian god by Papal Bull. So yes, it comes from the religion.
The dogma of exclusive salvation (Christians are "saved", other go to hell) is the root of genocide.
The dogma of exclusive salvation (Christians are "saved", other go to hell) is the root of genocide.
The Papal Bull called for the "overthrow of barbarous nations" and claimed all land in the name of the Christian god.
The conquistadors were driven by religious belief to murder and enslave the indigenous en mass, use their babies for target practice.
The conquistadors were driven by religious belief to murder and enslave the indigenous en mass, use their babies for target practice.
Those who created atrocity literature on "human sacrifice" murdered those they were "saving" from these "evil customs" at a much larger scale.
Why is this "better" than human sacrifice?
Why is this "better" than human sacrifice?
This one tweet tells you why adherent of Christianity (and Islam) destroyed the sacred sites of others. It comes from their core beliefs that are the same today.
"Monotheism" destroys because they believe "others" are evil and "devil-worshippers."
"Monotheism" destroys because they believe "others" are evil and "devil-worshippers."
Atrocity literature about “human sacrifice” excites Christians so much since their entire “salvation” story is based on the cult of human sacrifice.
“Jesus” is the “lamb of god”, bali ka bakra, who is sacrificed to “save” mankind.
Human sacrifice is core to their belief.
“Jesus” is the “lamb of god”, bali ka bakra, who is sacrificed to “save” mankind.
Human sacrifice is core to their belief.
Human sacrifice? The Christian conquistadors fed living native children, even babies, to their dogs.
And then their missionaries wrote stories of how bad the indigenous were for "human sacrifice" and needed to be "saved."
ranker.com
And then their missionaries wrote stories of how bad the indigenous were for "human sacrifice" and needed to be "saved."
ranker.com
This is WHY they create atrocity literature.
AFTER they go to native lands in greed for gold and land, AFTER they murder half the population and enslave the rest, AFTER they destroy the civilization and records, they can spin how terrible the victims they’d come to “save” were.
AFTER they go to native lands in greed for gold and land, AFTER they murder half the population and enslave the rest, AFTER they destroy the civilization and records, they can spin how terrible the victims they’d come to “save” were.
Loading suggestions...