jackchong.eth
jackchong.eth

@jackchong_jc

34 Tweets 11 reads May 04, 2022
DeFi will eat TradFi.
The question for 10x founders and investors is 1) timing and 2) where the DeFi 'bite' starts.
The International Monetary Fund has dedicated a chapter on DeFi in their 2022 report. Huge alpha drop!
HOW will DeFi eat TradFi? Bullish narratives here ๐Ÿงต๐Ÿ‘‡
1/x
IMF's Global Stability Report has 3 chapters:
1 - The Financial Stability Implications of the War in Ukraine
2 - The Sovereign-Bank Nexus in Emerging Markets: A Risky Embrace
3 - The Rapid Growth of Fintech: Vulnerabilities and Challenges for Financial Stability ๐Ÿ‘ˆ๐Ÿ”๐Ÿšจ
2/x
Chapter 3 mentions DeFi so we are going to focus on that chapter!
The original reports are available here
imf.org
3/x
Chapter 3 is about how fintech impacts the banking system. 1st half of the chapter is about neo-banks and shadow banking and their risks. 2nd half is about DeFi: how it works and risks involved.
Let's take a look at what IMF writes about DeFi ๐Ÿ‘€
4/x
I have to say, I am very impressed with IMF's precise explanation of DeFi, referencing @AaveAave, @compoundfinance, @CreamdotFinance, @DefiLlama, @defipulse, @graphprotocol.
No mention of crypto innovations tho (e.g DEX, AMM, PoS staking, flash loan)
5/x
So IMF thinks that 'DeFi has the potential to offer financial services with even greater efficiency, becoming a gravita- tional force that attracts a large number of crypto investors.'
But....
'It may also come at the cost of greater risks and uncertainties.'
6/x
Let's start with risks! IMF on DeFi risks:
DeFi is highly leveraged (but isn't TradFi too?) and volatile.
A robust liquidation mechanism becomes important.
It is triggered when a borrower fails to maintain the collateral requirement (= loan-to-value ratio threshold)
7/x
The DeFi lending/borrowing ecosystem is a literal perpetual liquidation machine.
When the collateral shortfall is large, liquidation can be costly. If left unaddressed, it could potentially undermine platform solvency.
@FantomFDN as an example ๐Ÿ‘‡
8/x
So, statistically, how robust is DeFi?
IMF runs a stochastic model to calculate, on average, if liquidation is profitable or loss-making.
The one-year probability of liquidation is 24%. Expected loss is about 0.9% with larger losses incurred by riskier borrowers
9/x
If you are a maths shape rotator, here's more on IMF's methodology (read: greek letters)
I am not an expert in quant finance, but it seems to me that IMF has done quite some original work!
Read them in the Online Annex in the original link.
9/x
So DeFi liquidation loses $ on average... what else?
IMF found that liquidity is concentrated among the whales... (e.g. @Tetranode @dcfgod)
Higher concentration -> whale exit -> bank run
10/x
IMF also noted DeFi-specific cyberattack risk
Our community has also seen a lot throughout this month....
11/x
That's it in terms of risks. What about efficiency?
DeFi should always be more efficient than TradFi. DeFi runs on code, TradFi runs on suits.
The margins should reflect this cost basis delta. Does it?
12/x
IMF did find that DeFi is super cost-efficient compared to TradFi in developed markets and emerging markets.
This is a really important finding!
IMF has given the world ironclad data that DeFi is cheaper than TradFi. It is the 1st research into cost comparison too!
13/x
For the quant and econ among you:
IMF used marginal cost as a proxy to compare TradFi and DeFi (debatable)
But token emission incentives are not accounted! The real cost in DeFi is likely higher.
My take: they are 'equity' & cost of capital for deposits
14/x
And DeFi's efficiency comes with higher risk!
That's a price I am willing to take for an open composable financial world.
DYOR!
15/x
IMF thought that DeFi's margins are low because they don't need 1) regulatory buffer 2) compliance cost
16/x
My reply to IMF: DeFi costs will stay low because
1) no regulatory buffer means the best protocol that constraint optimizes capital efficiency and risk wins
2) KYC/AML costs stay low thanks to SaaS and API providers
17/x
So, IMF thinks DeFi is efficient but risky. What policy recommendations do they make?
1) Regulate centralized DeFi entities (stablecoin issuers, CEXes, hosted wallets, and market makers)
2) Encourage industry group - self regulatory organisations
I love the 2) idea!
18/x
IMF told us some stone cold facts about DeFi. What's the action point? Here's the alpha drop.
If DeFi wants to truly eat TradFi, founders need to think hard about DeFi's value proposition.
DeFi is efficient, yes. But is it universally 10x more efficient than TradFi?
19/x
To switch TradFi users to DeFi, look in underserved TradFi markets. That's where DeFi is 10x better.
Emerging markets, unbanked, opaque assets, illiquid real world assets are all frontiers that DeFi should conquer
20/x
On DeFI efficiency, we need to break cost down to 1) origination cost 2) transaction cost (marginal cost)
It seems clear that given how cheap it is to trade TradFi equity, bring them on-chain is going to be a tough sell.
21/x
Flashy tokens ain't gonna bring sticky users to your protocol.
IMF has shown us the power of DeFi, a priori. Now, founders, go manifest your destiny to harness the power of DeFi, a posteriori!
22/x
IMF is a crown jewel of the Bretton Woods system. They hold the keys to institutional DeFi (and thus, help our bags).
Zoltan Pozsar wrote about Bretton Woods III. DeFi will gradually phase out inefficient TradFi.
Which side are you on, anon?
plus2.credit-suisse.com
23/x
DM me if you are researching on 1) DeFi comparative studies 2) asset digitalization/tokenization 3) just find this thread interesting!
Follow me for more ๐Ÿงตโ˜€๏ธ๐Ÿ’ช
Secondary note: how govs look at DeFi! (cc @paddi_hansen, and thanks for inspiring this thread on gov x defi !)
other thoughtful econ/long-term thinking crypto accounts I follow
@jmonegro @_charlienoyes @matthuang @n2ckchong @_PorterSmith @milesdeutscher @teddywoodward (his bearish rwa tweet is thoughtful!, tho respectfully disagree) @AnthonyLeeZhang @0xHamz @crypto_condom

Loading suggestions...