1/ In a study with 20,000 people, you can’t test for adverse events (even death) that occurs at a rate that’s less than 1 in 20,000. So when they pulled the trigger to jab the planet, they didn’t know if they were going to instantaneously kill 350,000 people or not.
2/ It’s easy to play Russian roulette with other people’s lives, while giving them a false sense of confidence that absolutely can’t be justified with data, because the data simply doesn’t exist.
3/ And 350,000 is the lower end of the potential death outcome, since the studies were only monitored for a handful of weeks and then the jab was launched. So long term impact could have been much greater than 350K. The available data couldn’t rule that scenario out.
4/ And since virtually no adequate long term fertility studies were performed, they were playing Russian roulette and risking potential population collapse, since only small changes in fertility rates are needed to drastically crash the population due to exponential math.
5/
Loading suggestions...