โ ๐ง๐ต๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฑ | ๐๐'๐ ๐ก๐ผ๐ ๐ง๐ฎ๐ท ๐ ๐ฎ๐ต๐ฎ๐น โ๏ธ ๐๐'๐ ๐๐ป ๐๐ป๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ ๐ฎ๐ต๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐น๐น๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ง๐ฒ๐ท๐ผ ๐ ๐ฎ๐ต๐ฎ๐น๐ฎ๐๐ฎ - ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ - ๐๐
It belongs to 1155 A.D i.e. almost 500 years anterior to Shahjahan
Continued [1/N]
#Tejomahalay #tejomahalaya #TajMahal
It belongs to 1155 A.D i.e. almost 500 years anterior to Shahjahan
Continued [1/N]
#Tejomahalay #tejomahalaya #TajMahal
To Understand Why Tajmahal is Tejo Mahalaya I have Given the Architectural Evidence in Part - 1 of this Thread in Bellow Mentioned like
Please Go through it Before Reading this Thread
[2/N]
Please Go through it Before Reading this Thread
[2/N]
Documentary Facts of Taj Mahal
Shahjahanโs own court chronicle, the Badshahnama, admits (PN 403, vol 1) that a grand mansion of unique splendor, capped with a dome was taken from the Jaipur Maharaja Jaisigh for Mumtazโs burial & the building was known as Raja Mansinghโs palace
Shahjahanโs own court chronicle, the Badshahnama, admits (PN 403, vol 1) that a grand mansion of unique splendor, capped with a dome was taken from the Jaipur Maharaja Jaisigh for Mumtazโs burial & the building was known as Raja Mansinghโs palace
Prince Aurangzebโs letter to his father,emperor Shahjahan,is recorded in atleast three chronicles titled `Aadaab-e-Alamgiriโ, `Yadgarnamaโ, and the `Muruqqa-i-Akbarabadiโ
[4/N]
[4/N]
The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur retains in his personal `Kapad Dwaraโ collection two orders from Shahjahan dated Dec 18, 1633 - R.176 and 177 demanding the Taj building complex.That was so blatant a usurpation that the then ruler of Jaipur was ashamed to make the document public
[5/N]
[5/N]
The Rajasthan State archives at Bikaner preserve three other โfirmansโ (orders) addressed by Shahjahan to the Jaipurโs ruler Jaisingh ordering the latter to supply marble (for Mumtazโs grave and koranic grafts) from his Makranna quarris, and stone cutters.
[6/N]
[6/N]
Moreover, the three mention neither the Taj Mahal, nor Mumtaz nor the burial. The cost and the quantity of the stone also are not mentioned. This proves that an insignificant quantity of marble was needed just for some superficial tinkering and tampering with the Taj Mahal
[7/N]
[7/N]
European Visitorโs Accounts
Tavernier, a French jeweller has recorded in his travel memoirs that Shahjahan purposely buried Mumtaz near the Taz-i-Makan
[8/N]
Tavernier, a French jeweller has recorded in his travel memoirs that Shahjahan purposely buried Mumtaz near the Taz-i-Makan
[8/N]
Peter Mundy, an English visitor to Agra recorded in 1632 (within only a year of Mumtazโs death) that `the places of note in and around Agra included Taj-e-Mahalโs tomb, gardens & bazaars
He therefore confirms that the Tajmahal had been a noteworthy building even before Shahjahan.
He therefore confirms that the Tajmahal had been a noteworthy building even before Shahjahan.
De Laet, a Dutch official has listed Mansinghโs palace about a mile from Agra fort, as an outstanding building of pre shahjahanโs time. Shahjahanโs court chronicle, the Badshahnama records, Mumtazโs burial in the same Mansinghโs palace.
[10/N]
[10/N]
Bernier, a contemporary French visitor has noted that non muslimโs were barred entry into the basement which contained a dazzling light.
Obviously, he reffered to the silver doors, gold railing, the gem studded lattice and strings of pearl hanging over Shivaโs idol.
[11/N]
Obviously, he reffered to the silver doors, gold railing, the gem studded lattice and strings of pearl hanging over Shivaโs idol.
[11/N]
Johan Albert Mandelslo, who describes life in agra in 1638 in detail (in his `Voyages and Travels to West-Indiesโ), makes no mention of the Tajmahal being under constuction though it is commonly erringly asserted or assumed that the Taj was being built from 1631 to 1653
[12/N]
[12/N]
Sanskrit Inscription :
A Sanskrit inscription too supports the conclusion that the Taj originated as a Shiva temple. Wrongly termed as the Bateshwar inscription (currently preserved on the top floor of the Lucknow museum), it Referes
[13/N]
A Sanskrit inscription too supports the conclusion that the Taj originated as a Shiva temple. Wrongly termed as the Bateshwar inscription (currently preserved on the top floor of the Lucknow museum), it Referes
[13/N]
Missing Elephants as per, Thomas Twinning, records
[14/N]
[14/N]
![Missing Elephants as per, Thomas Twinning, records
[14/N] https://t.co/GfVa9oYeZw](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FSipK9UacAAhNZ1.jpg)
Records Donโt Exist !!
court flatterers, blundering historians, somnolent archeologists, fiction writers, senile poets, careless tourists officials and erring guides who are responsible for hustling the world into believing in Shahjahanโs mythical authorship of the Taj.
[15/N]
court flatterers, blundering historians, somnolent archeologists, fiction writers, senile poets, careless tourists officials and erring guides who are responsible for hustling the world into believing in Shahjahanโs mythical authorship of the Taj.
[15/N]
Description of the gardens around the Taj of Shahjahanโs time mentions Ketaki, Jai, Jui, Champa, Maulashree, Harshringar and Bel. All these plants whose flowers or leaves are used in the worship of Hindu deities. Bel leaves are exclusively used in Lord Shivaโs worship.
[16/N]
[16/N]
Hindu temples are often built on river banks and sea beaches. The Taj is one such built on the bank of the Yamuna river an ideal location for a Shiva temple.
[17/N]
[17/N]
Prophet Mohammad has ordained that the burial spot of a Muslim should be inconspicuous & must not be marked by even a single tombstone. In flagrant violation of this the Tajmahal has one grave in the basement and another in the first-floor chamber both ascribed to Mumtaz
[18/N]
[18/N]
Tomb Is The Grave, Not The Building ๐
The Cenotaph chamber with marble screen. The point is why have an octagonal screen around two graves? It is more likely to have been an area of where sacred activities once took place.
[19/N]
The Cenotaph chamber with marble screen. The point is why have an octagonal screen around two graves? It is more likely to have been an area of where sacred activities once took place.
[19/N]
Pre-Shahjahan References To The Taj
Apparently the Taj as a central palace seems to have a controversial history The Taj was perhaps desecrated and looted by every Muslim invader from Mohammad Ghazni onwards
Shahjahan was the last Muslim to desecrate the Tajo Mahalaya
[20/N]
Apparently the Taj as a central palace seems to have a controversial history The Taj was perhaps desecrated and looted by every Muslim invader from Mohammad Ghazni onwards
Shahjahan was the last Muslim to desecrate the Tajo Mahalaya
[20/N]
Mumtaz died in Burhanpur, which is about 600 miles from Agra. Her grave is there intact. Therefore, the cenotaphs raised in stories of the Taj in her name seem to be fakes hiding in Hindu Shiva emblems.
[21/N]
[21/N]
Shahjahan was married to several other women before and after Mumtaz.
He Never Mentioned Special Attachment with her any where !
She, therefore, deserved no special consideration in having a wonder mausoleum built for her.
[22/N]
He Never Mentioned Special Attachment with her any where !
She, therefore, deserved no special consideration in having a wonder mausoleum built for her.
[22/N]
Forged Documents
[23/N]
[23/N]
![Forged Documents
[23/N] https://t.co/UQGuCwuee7](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FSipQBbakAEDVu6.jpg)
![Forged Documents
[23/N] https://t.co/UQGuCwuee7](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FSipQPkagAAqEHm.jpg)
Name if Self a Controversy ๐
The term Taj Mahal itself never occurs in any mughal court paper or chronicle even till Aurangzebโs era. The attempt to explain it away as Taj-i-mahal is therefore, ridiculous.
[24/N]
The term Taj Mahal itself never occurs in any mughal court paper or chronicle even till Aurangzebโs era. The attempt to explain it away as Taj-i-mahal is therefore, ridiculous.
[24/N]
Burial Date Unknown & Baseless Love Stories
Stories of Shahjahanโs exclusive infatuation for Mumtazโs are concoctions. They have no basis in history nor has any book ever written on their fancied love affairs.
[25/N]
Stories of Shahjahanโs exclusive infatuation for Mumtazโs are concoctions. They have no basis in history nor has any book ever written on their fancied love affairs.
[25/N]
Carbon 14 Test - The Archaeological evidence
A wooden piece from the riverside doorway of the Taj subjected to the carbon 14 test by an American Laboratory by Prof Marvin Mills has revealed the door to be 300 years older than Shahjahan
[26/N]
A wooden piece from the riverside doorway of the Taj subjected to the carbon 14 test by an American Laboratory by Prof Marvin Mills has revealed the door to be 300 years older than Shahjahan
[26/N]
It's Not Yet Finished Stay Tuned for Part - 3 of this thread โผ๏ธ
I have already Given Credits to All Historians please Refer to Thred Part -1
Please Give a Re Tweet & Share in your Circles so that More & More People come out from 400 years old Lie of Mughals
Har Har Mahadev ๐
I have already Given Credits to All Historians please Refer to Thred Part -1
Please Give a Re Tweet & Share in your Circles so that More & More People come out from 400 years old Lie of Mughals
Har Har Mahadev ๐
Please Ignore Typo in Tilte of thread I Missed Temple Word ๐
It's Not Taj Mahal โ๏ธ It's An Ancient Mahadev Temple Called Tejo Mahalaya - It belongs to 1155 A.D, i.e. almost 500 years anterior to Shahjahan - Part - II
Now Can't Rewrite or Edit this Any more ๐๐๐
It's Not Taj Mahal โ๏ธ It's An Ancient Mahadev Temple Called Tejo Mahalaya - It belongs to 1155 A.D, i.e. almost 500 years anterior to Shahjahan - Part - II
Now Can't Rewrite or Edit this Any more ๐๐๐
Loading suggestions...