@sumanthraman Thank you for not responding with specifics and thank you for responding on predictable lines. The weaponisation of Buddhism to pit it against Vedic Hinduism is textbook Marxist/postcolonial trope, which is what I was trying to explain to you.

@sumanthraman Each of these so-called Buddhist claims were manufactured to justify the razing of Hindu Temples by Muslim invaders and the Portuguese. When asked for historical evidence and archaeological proof, they would obfuscate just like you.

@sumanthraman I will give you a specific example. One party intervened in the Sabarimala case to claim that it was a Buddhist Temple taken over the Brahmins. A similar argument was made in the Ramjanmabhoomi case. Now can you see the pattern? If not, you are beyond redemption.

@sumanthraman Here is a simple question-if the Buddhist claims are indeed valid,why do these claims suddenly appear only when Hindus make a claim with respect to a Temple? Why can't such Buddhists actually pursue their claims to their logical conclusion like Hindus did in the case of Ayodhya?

@sumanthraman The Ayodhya case was run down & dismissed by d very same historians until excavation was order & archaeology shut d door on their cooked-up history.This is precisely what is happening now in Kashi.And FYI, none of these eminent historians was willing to step into the witness box.