Source: Journal of the Pali Text Society 1896 by Thomas William Rhys Davids (Scholar of the Pāli language and founder of the Pāli Text Society) Page 87-92
Myths of Persecution of Buddhists
Myths of Persecution of Buddhists
The Ashokavadana claims that Pushyamitra offered Roman dinaras as a reward for killing Buddhist monks, but the dinara did not come into general circulation in India before the 1st century BCE.
Pushyamitra's overthrow of the Mauryans cannot be considered as a Brahmin uprising as Ashoka's edicts mention the Brahmins before Shramanas, and the appointment of a Brahmin general (Pushyamitra) shows that the Brahmins were honoured at the Mauryan court.
The fact that the Ashokavadana mentions Pushyamitra as a Mauryan further erodes its historical credibility, and weakens the hypothesis that he persecuted Buddhists because he was a Brahmin.
Surprise surpirse, even Romila Thapar writes that the lack of concrete archaeological evidence casts doubt on the claims of Buddhist persecution by Pushyamitra. (Book: Aśoka and the Decline of the Mauryas by Romila Thapar)
Statements occur in legendary poems written many centuries after the events referred to & have all the appearance of mere rhetorical exaggeration.
- There is nothing about persecution in the Pali Pitakas.
- The murder of Maudgalyayana, at the instigation of Niganthas is described only in the "Dhammapada Commentary" and then as a case of individual crime.
- The assault on Angulimala had no religious motive.
- The murder of Maudgalyayana, at the instigation of Niganthas is described only in the "Dhammapada Commentary" and then as a case of individual crime.
- The assault on Angulimala had no religious motive.
during the centuries before Asoka, of a higher level of enlightenment and culture than has, I venture to think, been hitherto sufficiently recognised in the West." - T. W. RHYS DAVIDS.
Loading suggestions...