1/ A thread taking a closer look at the alleged 'monkeypox virus'. ๐ ๐ฆ ๐งต๐
It's short and sweet!
It's short and sweet!
2/ In the previous thread, we found that the alleged differences between 'chickenpox' & 'smallpox' are somewhat questionable.
For a while, 'chickenpox' and 'smallpox' were thought to be the same 'disease'.
So now, what about 'monkeypox'?
For a while, 'chickenpox' and 'smallpox' were thought to be the same 'disease'.
So now, what about 'monkeypox'?
3/ Here, we find that, once again, the alleged differences between the two 'diseases' are virtually non-existent.
Lymphadenopathy is said to be the defining characteristic.
However, this symptom is also said to be caused by a number of factors โ including 'chickenpox'.
Lymphadenopathy is said to be the defining characteristic.
However, this symptom is also said to be caused by a number of factors โ including 'chickenpox'.
4/ And although the CDC claim that lymphadenopathy never manifests in cases of 'smallpox', some sources suggest that it does.
5/ And then, we're also told that, historically, little attention has been paid to lymph nodes when examining 'smallpox' cases.
So how then, are they able to confidently assert that lymphadenopathy was not commonly found in 'smallpox' cases?
#R14" target="_blank" rel="noopener" onclick="event.stopPropagation()">ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
So how then, are they able to confidently assert that lymphadenopathy was not commonly found in 'smallpox' cases?
#R14" target="_blank" rel="noopener" onclick="event.stopPropagation()">ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
6/ It's perhaps worth mentioning at this stage that lymphadenopathy is also said to be a common side effect of the 'smallpox vaccine'...
And the CDC of course, seem to be fully aware of this.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
And the CDC of course, seem to be fully aware of this.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
7/ And then, in the case of 'monkeypox', we're also told that this distinctive feature doesn't manifest in 10% of cases.
Given that it is also said to be a 'rare disease', one wonders whether we'll see this percentage change as the number of cases goes up.
Given that it is also said to be a 'rare disease', one wonders whether we'll see this percentage change as the number of cases goes up.
8/ The 'monkeypox virus' was "first identified in 1958 in Copenhagen during an outbreak of vesicular disease among captive primates."
It's interesting to note that the monkeys in which this happened, were being used for 'polio vaccine research'...
It's interesting to note that the monkeys in which this happened, were being used for 'polio vaccine research'...
9/ As usual, no explanation is provided for why this 'disease' would magically 'appear' one day โ especially when we're also told that "monkeypox has probably occurred for millennia in central Africa".
10/ The other big difference we haven't talked about yet, is, perhaps, the most important one.
Monkeypox is a 'virus' that has an 'animal reservoir' โ meaning it cannot be 'eradicated'.
As we all know, 'smallpox' is the poster child for the alleged success of 'vaccination'.
Monkeypox is a 'virus' that has an 'animal reservoir' โ meaning it cannot be 'eradicated'.
As we all know, 'smallpox' is the poster child for the alleged success of 'vaccination'.
11/ So they have a problem.
If they come out and say that 'monkeypox' is the same 'disease' as 'smallpox', then it means their 'virus eradication' success story falls apart.
So they rebranded it.
It's the same trick they play, over and over again!
If they come out and say that 'monkeypox' is the same 'disease' as 'smallpox', then it means their 'virus eradication' success story falls apart.
So they rebranded it.
It's the same trick they play, over and over again!
12/ These 'diseases' are all the same.
And if you're wondering what they're caused by, see the thread on toxaemia:
And if you're wondering what they're caused by, see the thread on toxaemia:
13/ And then, if you're wondering what the toxin(s) in question may be, I suggest starting here:
Loading suggestions...