The prince was then rescued and protected by a heroic British officer. He ended up fighting with the colonialists against his malicious and fundamentalist uncle claiming the throne (4/10)
However, in India, it was perceived as a major propaganda film by the British empire to justify their rule over racially inferior Indians and vitriolic attitude against the fabric of communal harmony in North West Frontier (5/10)
The Pathans were portrayed as cruel, manipulative, treacherous and set in fundamentalist ideologies, as opposed to the British, who were gallant and willing to sacrifice to protect the innocents against the tyrants (6/10)
The film’s Islamophobic and anti-India propaganda brought hundreds of working-class Muslim young people out into the streets of Bombay led by a group called Muslim Naujawans, alongside several film critics and writers (7/10)
The agitation spread to Madras, down the coastal Konkan area and to Bengal that had a substantial Muslim population and a strong nationalist sentiment. Khān Abdul Ghaffār Khān also raised his voice demanding a ban (9/10)
In Bombay, protestors picketed at the theatre entrances, which led to police violence and arrests, bringing uptown Bombay to a virtual halt for a week. Eventually the film was banned in Bombay, Madras and Bengal (10/10)
Source: Censored Itineraries of a Lost Communistic Film and Creating Cinema's Reading Publics/ Debashree Mukherjee. Economic and Political Weekly/Anu Kumar. Imdb.com, Wikimedia
And on the topic of Sabu Dastagir, here is one of our earlier threads on his fascinating journey to the silver screen
Loading suggestions...