This is an extraordinarily important point when it comes to the maintenance & packaging requirements of guided missiles.
If you don't do either right, between 1 in 5 and 1 in 3 fail.
Russia didn'tπ§΅π
1/
If you don't do either right, between 1 in 5 and 1 in 3 fail.
Russia didn'tπ§΅π
1/
The US military and most other western aligned militaries build guided missile preventative maintenance programs around long service, highly trained non-commissioned officers (NCO's).
These NCO's are highly trained in costly due to low production numbers diagnostic tools &
5/
These NCO's are highly trained in costly due to low production numbers diagnostic tools &
5/
...simply not the same.
And the levels of Kleptocracy rampant in the Russian military since the 2012 ascension of Defense Minister Shoigu means training & expensive diagnostic equipment have been defrauded.
7/
And the levels of Kleptocracy rampant in the Russian military since the 2012 ascension of Defense Minister Shoigu means training & expensive diagnostic equipment have been defrauded.
7/
The S-36 missile entered service in the mid-1970's.
It's supply chain fell apart in the in the early 1990's with the collapse of the Soviet Union.
And there was no money at all for three years in the mid-1990's and it uses UDMH as fuel and nitrogen tetroxide.
9/
It's supply chain fell apart in the in the early 1990's with the collapse of the Soviet Union.
And there was no money at all for three years in the mid-1990's and it uses UDMH as fuel and nitrogen tetroxide.
9/
The Global Security website states the UR-100N was upgraded from a service life of 10 years to 15 to 25 years and then to 25 to 30 years.
The Shoigu era Russian MoD now claims the UR-100N lasts over 36 years.
globalsecurity.org
12/
The Shoigu era Russian MoD now claims the UR-100N lasts over 36 years.
globalsecurity.org
12/
Since the Avanguard hypersonic glide vehicle (HGV) is mounted on an UR-100N/SS-19. It means the former is a very questionable new wine because of the age of it's old, corroded, wine skin.
I am an HGV weapon skeptic. They are not 1st strike weapon.
13/
I am an HGV weapon skeptic. They are not 1st strike weapon.
13/
Avanguard HGV are a highly payload inefficient (trades six MIRV warheads for a single HGV) form of depressed trajectory ICBM intended as a ABM battle control radar defense suppression munition so USN Aegis DD's with SM-3 IIA ABM's could not bounce
14/
14/
That a long distance Trans-Siberian railway trip in a gondola car rattled tough tactical missiles like the Iskander to between 1-in-5 to 1-in-3 unreliable...
...things just don't look good for Russian ICBM reliability and maintainability in train or road mobile launchers.
19/
...things just don't look good for Russian ICBM reliability and maintainability in train or road mobile launchers.
19/
One wonders how many ICBMs and SLBMs are serviceable and how many would get close to their Designated Mean Point of Impact (DMPIs) if launched.
20/End
20/End
P.S. This didn't work out:
R-36 (missile) - Wikipedia
"In March 2006 Russia made an agreement with Ukraine that will regulate cooperation between the two countries on maintaining the R-36M2 missiles. It was reported that the cooperation with Ukraine will allow Russia to extend
R-36 (missile) - Wikipedia
"In March 2006 Russia made an agreement with Ukraine that will regulate cooperation between the two countries on maintaining the R-36M2 missiles. It was reported that the cooperation with Ukraine will allow Russia to extend
...the service life of the R-36M2 missiles by at least ten to 28 years."
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
Loading suggestions...