He’s right. We must be taught about non-Mughals too, although I dunno what he really means by “our kings.” Being taught about just the Mughals, or Muslim rulers (because most certainly Sultanate = Mughals = Muslims in his head) is wrong.
But is that really happening?
But is that really happening?
CBSE, one of India’s apex boards, prescribes history from class VI thru class XII. So let’s examine what it prescribes for its students. We’ll take NCERT books as our official reference.
One class at a time.
One class at a time.
So in its entire 7-yr curriculum, NCERT includes a grand total of one chapter on Delhi Sultanate, two on Mughals, and one on the Middle East in the context of world history. That’s it, only 4 chapters on Muslims.
Out of 67.
Out of 67.
And don’t forget, that’s three chapters (excluding the one on Middle East) to cover nearly 500 years of history under Muslim rule.
And what about Prithviraj Chauhan?
And what about Prithviraj Chauhan?
Nothing beyond a cursory mention in VI. But that’s one man. And he didn’t even impact national history. Sure he’s important in Rajasthan and sure the state syllabus does justice you him with dedicated chapters. But nationally? Even Shivaji and Akbar don’t have dedicated chapters.
Now whether you still wish to continue cursing our curriculum for being too “Muslim-heavy” is your choice. Just know that your criticism doesn’t hold up to empirical scrutiny.
P.S. Some might call this observation dishonest as it considers the latest curriculum. Fair enough. So here’s one from 2014, before BJP got the chance to “fix” it: cbse.gov.in
See pages 234-243.
To summarize…
Total topics: 31
Topics on Muslims: 3
See pages 234-243.
To summarize…
Total topics: 31
Topics on Muslims: 3
Loading suggestions...