Politics
Science
Genetics
Social Issues
Social Sciences
Political Commentary
Behavioral Science
Public Policy
They’re coming for behavioral genetics. But honestly, the field deserves it for disavowing any policy implications of its work, which could have gotten it some defenders and allies. It was never possible to hide the implications of the field from the left. noahcarl.substack.com
Disavowing political implications of something that so clearly has political implications doesn’t work!
You can’t reason people away from blank slatism because being a blank slatist in the first place is so irrational it suggests someone doesn’t form beliefs based on evidence.
You can’t reason people away from blank slatism because being a blank slatist in the first place is so irrational it suggests someone doesn’t form beliefs based on evidence.
Charles Murray is one man, and has been 100x more influential on public policy than everyone else who writes about genetics put together, because he got political instead of hiding in a university and trying to convince the womyn studies crowd.
Loading suggestions...