Very nice. Alt account of /@vedicwisdom1 Running away Like swami Dayananda.
Anyways this account had a tweet with the name "open challenge to all trads to show "рдордиреНрддреНрд░рдмреНрд░рд╛рд╣реНрдордгреЛрд╡реЗрджрдирд╛рдордзреЗрдпрдореН" in katyayana sutras.
So here continue till end we will show.
Anyways this account had a tweet with the name "open challenge to all trads to show "рдордиреНрддреНрд░рдмреНрд░рд╛рд╣реНрдордгреЛрд╡реЗрджрдирд╛рдордзреЗрдпрдореН" in katyayana sutras.
So here continue till end we will show.
Karpatri ji in his debate said that whatever you are saying goes against your own siddhanta because dayanand has said that no other rishi than Katyayan believed that Brahmanas are Vedas. And the sutras of katyayana belonged to the Madhyandina recession.
Here is the statement of dayanand. Then karpatri ji gave the proof from sutras other than that of Krishna yajurveda.
In the chapter termed as рдкреНрд░рддрд┐рдЬреНрдЮрд╛рдкрд░рд┐рд╢рд┐рд╖реНрдЯ of рдХрд╛рддреНрдпрд╛рдпрдирд╢реНрд░реМрддрд╕реВрддреНрд░ and рдХрд╛рддреНрдпрд╛рдпрдирдкреНрд░рд╛рддрд┐рд╢рд╛рдЦреНрдп the "рдордиреНрддреНрд░рдмреНрд░рд╛рд╣реНрдордгреЛрдирд╛рдордзреЗрдпрдореН" occurs.
Now what they will say "рдкрд░рд┐рд╢рд┐рд╖реНрдЯ" is not the part of granth.
Now what they will say "рдкрд░рд┐рд╢рд┐рд╖реНрдЯ" is not the part of granth.
Loading suggestions...