🧵 A Response to “Tālibān: The Nullifiers of Islām Which They Have Committed”
1. The Tālibān hasn’t abandoned ruling by Sharī`ah, but are just taking a more gradual approach to enforcing it. This is indifferent to the Baibars and the Mamluks who were excused by… (1)
1. The Tālibān hasn’t abandoned ruling by Sharī`ah, but are just taking a more gradual approach to enforcing it. This is indifferent to the Baibars and the Mamluks who were excused by… (1)
Shaykhu’l-Islām Ibn Taymiyyah رحمه الله, and indifferent to the “IEA 1.0” which was excused by the `Ulamā’ you praise and those you consider Mujāhidīn.
The IEA also hasn’t committed Kufr, because no clear ruling of the Sharī`ah was replaced in legislation and the state is… (2)
The IEA also hasn’t committed Kufr, because no clear ruling of the Sharī`ah was replaced in legislation and the state is… (2)
enjoining good and forbidding evil in a more gradual approach. The Hānafī Math’hab also permits judging by local customs in mattered that don’t contradict Islām.
I think can be a discussion to gradual enforcement of Sharī`ah under circumstances. One major member of the… (3)
I think can be a discussion to gradual enforcement of Sharī`ah under circumstances. One major member of the… (3)
“Base 1.0” for example said that due to decades of secularism, people shouldn’t be lashed for drinking until mass re-education of society is achieved. Shaykh at-Tarīfī فرج الله عنه also said that Hudūd can (most likely conditionally) be enforced by Tadarruj. (4)
2. This point is not a nullifier even if it were true, because it doesn’t fall under Tawallī, which is supporting the Kuffār against Muslims to have Kufr manifest over Islām. Rather, it falls under Isti`ānah bil-Mushrikīn, which isn’t necessarily Kufr. (5)
3. I think chain Takfīr on those who don’t Takfīr the Imāmī Rāfidah is valid on a general and not an individual level, provided that he knows the reality of the clear Kufriyyāt in Rāfidhī `Aqīdah. The people of knowledge in the Tālibān do Takfīr the Shī`ah on a general level. (6)
To excuse a group of Rawāfidh however, for example it’s laymen, is a matter of Ikhtilāf and Ijtihād, so appointing them to high positions of power wouldn’t be Kufr as there’s a valid view that they’re Muslims.
Even this point however needs deeper investigation, (7)
Even this point however needs deeper investigation, (7)
because it’s not confirmed whether those who identified with the Shī`ah and were appointed as governors in the IEA actually held the Kufrī `Aqīdah of the Imāmī Rāfidah.
4. Disbelieving in the Tāghūt, which includes making Takfīr of them, is one of the foundations of Islām, (8)
4. Disbelieving in the Tāghūt, which includes making Takfīr of them, is one of the foundations of Islām, (8)
but not acknowledging a specific Tāghūt as an apostate Tāghūt isn’t a nullifier, for this a matter that’s possibly open to uncertainty, Ikhtilāf and Ijtihād.
This whole point is insane because it’s practically Hāzimī chain Takfīr. (9)
This whole point is insane because it’s practically Hāzimī chain Takfīr. (9)
5. Befriending the Kuffār has multiple levels and not all of them fall under Tawallī which is Kufr. It might also fall under Muwalāt which can either be Fisq or Kufr.
Even then it’s questionable whether what the IEA sometimes does is even Muwalāt. (10)
Even then it’s questionable whether what the IEA sometimes does is even Muwalāt. (10)
Sometimes it could just be making economic deals which is generally permissible.
The IEA also hasn’t allied with any Kāfir against the Muslims, but it could be argued they took aid from them which isn’t always Kufr and falls under a seperate category as discussed earlier. (11)
The IEA also hasn’t allied with any Kāfir against the Muslims, but it could be argued they took aid from them which isn’t always Kufr and falls under a seperate category as discussed earlier. (11)
Loading suggestions...