Here's a thread where @BNNBreaking demonstrates how @Twitter collaborated with the extreme left to shut us down, and one of them in particular was @BusinessInsider, so we'll use them in today's example:
So, now we'll show you how @BusinessInsider pays @Twitter to perform "hit-jobs" on people.
It has 3.7 million followers, according to its @Twitter account.
But here's the thing: most of them are "fake."
It has 3.7 million followers, according to its @Twitter account.
But here's the thing: most of them are "fake."
Just take a look at their @BusinessInsider account.
My main page receives more "engagement" than any of their "native" posts, and my account only has 188k followers.
My main page receives more "engagement" than any of their "native" posts, and my account only has 188k followers.
There is a distinction you must "recognize."
There are "native" posts and "promoted" posts.
Native posts are things we publish that appear in your feed organically, like the one I just did.
There are "native" posts and "promoted" posts.
Native posts are things we publish that appear in your feed organically, like the one I just did.
Media "pay" for promoted posts to appear in your feed by "targeting" you.
They target you based on your demo & interests (for examp: Lib, Conserv & more detailed). This is an excellent tool for instilling hatred & conflict.
This is how the media uses it to ruin people's lives.
They target you based on your demo & interests (for examp: Lib, Conserv & more detailed). This is an excellent tool for instilling hatred & conflict.
This is how the media uses it to ruin people's lives.
And, this is how the media manipulates you into believing them:
They buy fake followers to give you the impression that they have "real followers" when they are simply buying "promoted" posts to give you the impression that their "millions of followers" are engaging...
They buy fake followers to give you the impression that they have "real followers" when they are simply buying "promoted" posts to give you the impression that their "millions of followers" are engaging...
with that actual article to give you some "legitimacy" to participate and read that article, and you should recognize them as trustworthy because it has millions of fake followers behind it with a verified check mark.
It's a huge con.
It's a huge con.
Here's how they're destroying people's lives.
Sorry, @stoolpresidente, but I'm going to use you as an example because I believe it will help you in your current court case and also open the eyes to the others that have been wrongfully vilified by the media.
Sorry, @stoolpresidente, but I'm going to use you as an example because I believe it will help you in your current court case and also open the eyes to the others that have been wrongfully vilified by the media.
In order to fully understand this, you must be familiar with how content, engagement metrics, data and natural network effects work.
Which puts me in a unique position.
Which puts me in a unique position.
Here's the post @thisisinsider used to seed the article by @mjnblack, the reporter behind the story, who only had 10.6k followers.
Take a look at that engagement.
4,231 RTs, 2,635 Quote RTs & 18,100 Likes.
This was not a native post. This was a promoted paid "hit job".
Take a look at that engagement.
4,231 RTs, 2,635 Quote RTs & 18,100 Likes.
This was not a native post. This was a promoted paid "hit job".
For years, Henry Blodget, @hblodget, has been running this con-job. A crook will always be a crook.
If he can rob hundreds of millions of dollars from pension funds while being barred from the SEC, his moral values will not change the way he cuts his bread.
If he can rob hundreds of millions of dollars from pension funds while being barred from the SEC, his moral values will not change the way he cuts his bread.
Don't believe me, here's some "native" posts about @stoolpresidente that @thisisinsider wrote without a "promoted paid hit job" on its 3.7 million followers.
Guess what the engagement was?
1 comment, 2 RTs?
Guess what the engagement was?
1 comment, 2 RTs?
So now you understand how @Twitter is just a big hit-job machine because it's the fastest way to spread disinformation, and how the media machines here can destroy lives as quickly as possible by using this machine to trick you into believing them.
$TWTR knows about all of this.
$TWTR knows about all of this.
But it prints money so why would it care?
Imagine you've spent your entire life building your career, working hard to establish a reputation.
And a platform allows for these "manufactured hit jobs" because it generates so much money from them...
Imagine you've spent your entire life building your career, working hard to establish a reputation.
And a platform allows for these "manufactured hit jobs" because it generates so much money from them...
as in the case of @BNNBreaking (directly trying to shut down)
If they can do it to @stoolepresidente, why not you, your daughter or your son?
They also did it to me, my story will be saved for last because it is the most saddest of all. That's why these jerks have gone silent.
If they can do it to @stoolepresidente, why not you, your daughter or your son?
They also did it to me, my story will be saved for last because it is the most saddest of all. That's why these jerks have gone silent.
By the way, journalists who do this sort of thing usually have a good life. @ajs, the first person who fabricated a hit piece on me for @businessinsider, is now the editor of @Fortunemagazine.
Unfortune is a better name for that magazine now.
Unfortune is a better name for that magazine now.
Any company that has been labeled as a "fortune company" will be haunted for the rest of their lives.
@mjnblack is still at @thisisinsider, most likely awaiting a promotion.
Until we break the cycle of hurting others and #FixTwitter so that we can #ProtectYourChild.
@mjnblack is still at @thisisinsider, most likely awaiting a promotion.
Until we break the cycle of hurting others and #FixTwitter so that we can #ProtectYourChild.
This is why I gave up trying to sue any media company for defamation because the system is designed to protect them because of NYTimes vs. Sullivan, a 1964 decision of the United States Supreme Court ruling that the First Amendment's freedom of speech protections limit the...
...ability of American public officials to sue for defamation.
Maybe the Supreme Court can look into overturning this and giving us our rights back?
Maybe the Supreme Court can look into overturning this and giving us our rights back?
This is why would I throw away money and three years of my life on a system that is designed to benefit this corrupt system?
When I can instead help educate you on this very corrupt system and help dismantle it?
When I can instead help educate you on this very corrupt system and help dismantle it?
If you haven't already, restore some sanity in your life by blocking @businessinsider and @thisisinsider.
P.S. I'll be publishing a full analysis of BusinessInsider's Fake Account Analysis in a couple of hours (taking a bit longer), but thought I'd start with this story first.
P.S. I'll be publishing a full analysis of BusinessInsider's Fake Account Analysis in a couple of hours (taking a bit longer), but thought I'd start with this story first.
As promised, we are going to share with you some of our initial @BusinessInsider analysis.
I've always believed that the truth shall set you free, or in this case, the "data."
I've always believed that the truth shall set you free, or in this case, the "data."
As demonstrated in a previous thread, the number of followers you have on @Twitter is now completely irrelevant, until it fixes the fake inflated follower problem, spam, bot, and dead account issues.
As evidenced by one of my first threads on how we called BS on @Twitter's mDAU, we use a different metric called Live Active Users, which we establish by looking at the number of years an account has existed since they last tweeted, replied on Twitter.
Yes, lurkers exist. So we use "years" as the metric.
For @BusinessInsider, let's take a look.
They have two extreme outliers.
40% of their followers are from the previous year, all of whom haven't tweeted.
And, for the past three years, 25% of them have not tweeted at all.
For @BusinessInsider, let's take a look.
They have two extreme outliers.
40% of their followers are from the previous year, all of whom haven't tweeted.
And, for the past three years, 25% of them have not tweeted at all.
Further data analysis revealed that these accounts are simply "inflated" accounts used to grease their follower accounts.
Their con is up.
Their con is up.
To get a wider reach, I'm going to try running this as a promoted ad and see if it gets past Twitter's filters. If it does, for those keeping track, this is how many native impressions I received from the organic post.
For those asking why I promoted this:
1.) You are a troll farm or employee, trying to distract, because you have not read the above tweet. 👆
2.) I also promoted this as "Karma for @hblodget. Because, payback is always a bitch!~
Read about troll farms:
1.) You are a troll farm or employee, trying to distract, because you have not read the above tweet. 👆
2.) I also promoted this as "Karma for @hblodget. Because, payback is always a bitch!~
Read about troll farms:
Loading suggestions...