I'm twting his with some reluctance not because I doubt any of the stuff uncovered here but because it engages in unnecessary vanity boosterism of certain individuals involved. It seems there is some money involved here & money to be made by some which has
science.org
science.org
given it the high profile airing it is getting. The primary reason for twting this out is that biomedical research & more broadly branches of molecular biology/biochemistry allied with it are rife with such cases. Indeed there clear examples where the same tabloids like Science&
Nature & other sensationalist venues of the Cell family have done absolutely nothing to correct a lot of the fake science they have published. The impact of recent pandemic on biomedical research/production, the rise of ML-based methods & the money flowing into certain research
quarters might actually cause a rise rather than a fall in this as more sophisticated "deep fakes" are probably already in the literature, especially in the papers coming from the Galtonian axis. This would probably aided by the puppet rulers who are pulled by big phαrμa
Loading suggestions...