The justification of keeping the allied troops in India, he says, is to protect India from he probable Japanese agression.
“I cannot...insist on [withdrawal of Allied forces], because I want to resist with all my might the charge of inviting Japan to India.”
“I cannot...insist on [withdrawal of Allied forces], because I want to resist with all my might the charge of inviting Japan to India.”
If the allied forces remained in India after Independence, during WW2, India would've become a war front, and it’ld have suffered large scale civilian casualties.
But Gandhiji's concern for future of India, given the chances of Japanese (Axis) agression were also legitimate.
But Gandhiji's concern for future of India, given the chances of Japanese (Axis) agression were also legitimate.
The answer to this was, as Savarkar envisaged, Hindu Militarization.
Rather than leaving the British (& American) army in India under their control, it'ld be better to infiltrate the army, & have self-sufficient defence for India in case the British left.
Rather than leaving the British (& American) army in India under their control, it'ld be better to infiltrate the army, & have self-sufficient defence for India in case the British left.
Loading suggestions...