In Rgveda Shakala samhita the total number of letters is 4,32,000. Rishis have calculated every word of Veda so the knowledge can be passed without a single letter getting lost.
Similar is the case with the tradition of interpretation. You can notice it in DarshanaShastras too. In Vedanta the debate about what is the meaning of अथ in the sutra अथातो ब्रह्मजिज्ञासा has taken many books to explain.
Interpretation of vedas require much effort.
Durgacharya has written {meaning in image
ईदृशेषु शब्दार्थन्यायसङ्कटेषु मन्त्रार्थघटनेषु दुरवबोधेषु मतिमतां मतयो न प्रतिहन्यन्ते, वयं त्वेतावदत्रावबुद्ध्यामह {Nirukta 7.31}
Here the meaning of the term "वैश्वानर" is being discussed
Durgacharya has written {meaning in image
ईदृशेषु शब्दार्थन्यायसङ्कटेषु मन्त्रार्थघटनेषु दुरवबोधेषु मतिमतां मतयो न प्रतिहन्यन्ते, वयं त्वेतावदत्रावबुद्ध्यामह {Nirukta 7.31}
Here the meaning of the term "वैश्वानर" is being discussed
Nowadays people without the knowledge of tradition, without a year spent in the reading of traditional texts and commentaries of acharyas are giving their own meaning of shastras by reading something on xyz.pdf.
and hindus even take them seriously. Xyz is big scientist and researcher so he might be saying right.
The day hindus will be sure that "Only the meaning given by the scholars belonging to unbroken vedic tradition is valid to us". All these misinformations will vanish.
The day hindus will be sure that "Only the meaning given by the scholars belonging to unbroken vedic tradition is valid to us". All these misinformations will vanish.
Loading suggestions...