In your article, you claimed that Jai Shri Ram "has become synonymous with anti-Muslim violence in India". #HindusUnderAttackInUK
However, the extremist who desecrated a Hindu temple is referred to as a 'man' in the article.
What is the religious affiliation of the man?
However, the extremist who desecrated a Hindu temple is referred to as a 'man' in the article.
What is the religious affiliation of the man?
Your article also contains phrases such as "unplanned protest of Hindu men," and "Hindu men were filmed marching."
You have distinctly associated religious identity with groups of protestors.
So why did you leave out the religion of the extremist who uprooted saffron flag?
You have distinctly associated religious identity with groups of protestors.
So why did you leave out the religion of the extremist who uprooted saffron flag?
Is it because the extremist happens to be your co-religionist?
And is that why you shrewdly attached the statement of Lakhani, hailing an Imam for supposedly protecting the temple?
I can understand your compulsions.
web.archive.org
And is that why you shrewdly attached the statement of Lakhani, hailing an Imam for supposedly protecting the temple?
I can understand your compulsions.
web.archive.org
This is 2022. No one is this naive anymore. Everyone knows why you found it essential to counter-balance an act of extremism with a supposed 'good deed' of a bystander Imam.
Forget the readers. At least be honest with yourself. Period. @ainajkhan
Forget the readers. At least be honest with yourself. Period. @ainajkhan
For those who don't know the context, check this:
🤲
Loading suggestions...