I try not to swear, but FFS @Reuters , really? Really!?
Performatively pretending not to know things which are knowable and indeed known is not unbiased reporting.
"Kyiv and the West denounced as a sham" - well maybe you should do reporting and find out if it *was* a sham, huh?
Performatively pretending not to know things which are knowable and indeed known is not unbiased reporting.
"Kyiv and the West denounced as a sham" - well maybe you should do reporting and find out if it *was* a sham, huh?
It wouldn't be that hard! There's plenty of video evidence of voting being done without concealed ballots in the presence of armed Russian troops. There's also the fact that the areas of the referendums are *active war zones* which might distort the voting?
And of course the voting margins are ridiculous on their face.
Utterly absurd. The author and every editor involved in the piece should retreat from society in shame, with a bag over their heads.
Utterly absurd. The author and every editor involved in the piece should retreat from society in shame, with a bag over their heads.
Oh, they nuked the tweet. Well, they haven't nuked the story and honestly it's not much better: reuters.com
Loading suggestions...