The Egyptian cosmos was conceived primarily as consisting of 3 realms: the flat mountain-rimmed earth; the sky above the earth; and the atmosphere between the two. None of these realms was thought of as being simply physical, each one manifested an inner, divine presence.
To describe the Egyptian cosmos is also to describe a world of divine beings whose nature is expressed in their respective cosmological domains. These domains are only marginally physical, and insofar as they are physical they are also symbolic.
For the Egyptians, the lower realm of the earth was represented in its entirety in the image of the Beloved Land. It was pictured as a wide alluvial plain, through the centre of which the Great River flowed; on either side it was bounded by a range of mountains.
His face is turned toward the earth, seemingly in a gesture of resignation to a fate that entails having become ensnared in the realm of matter. Geb is rarely shown looking up.
It is as if, with a mixture of surprise and sadness, his gaze is arrested by what is below rather than by what is above him. What is above him is his beloved consort Nut, the goddess of heaven.
Geb was also pictured in other forms. Most usually, he had the form of a goose, which was the main domestic egg-laying bird in Egypt up until the reign of Thutmosis III.
The cosmic goose would appear to be an image of the androgynous Creator of Worlds, whom in the Heliopolitan theology is Atum-Ra. Just as it is from the goose’s egg that life arises, so it is from the god Geb at the beginning of time that life emerges and takes on material form.
In these two different ways of imaging Geb we are not only presented with two different aspects of the god; we also come face to face with the paradoxical nature of polytheistic thinking ...
... which is that any single god with apparently limited functions or sphere of operation can at the same time be apprehended as the ultimate Godhead and source of all existence.
It is interesting that both Geb and Nut are nearly always represented naked, which is not normally the case with other deities of the Egyptian pantheon. Perhaps this is because they were thought of primarily in their role as lovers.
Or it is because these two deities—more than any others—show themselves without reserve to the imaginative eye. For they have given themselves utterly to the world of manifestation, and hide nothing from those able to see beyond the outer surfaces of the sense-perceptible world.
With these images of Nut we have only marginally to do with the sensory phenomena of the blue sky of the day or the dark, star-filled night. But this way of representing the dome of the sky is not simply an imaginative construct projected onto the heavens.
Nut is the cosmic correspondent to Geb the earth god. If she is the great mother who clothes all beings in their spiritual forms, then it is Geb who gives them material embodiment. They can be seen as 2 principles: the heavenly/spiritual and the earthly/material source of forms.
However we understand his snake form, we notice how Nut does indeed “enclose the earth” in her all-encompassing embrace.
Loading suggestions...