They were scrutinizing one of the same UNC/Wuhan Institute of Virology papers that the authors of the new preprint are evaluating today.
nature.com
alexwasburne.substack.com
nature.com
alexwasburne.substack.com
Virologist Kristian Andersen finally shared the results of his own analysis on Twitter last week. He reached different conclusions than the preprint authors.
But is this line of inquiry totally outrageous?
I donβt think so, given Andersen was once asking the same Qs.
But is this line of inquiry totally outrageous?
I donβt think so, given Andersen was once asking the same Qs.
Loading suggestions...