Then the NYT puff piece ends with a note on the cryptic thread, which SBF says "I'm making it up as I go."
It may actually be a ruse -- he adds one tweet after deleting an old incriminating tweet -- so as to fool tweet bot counters:
It may actually be a ruse -- he adds one tweet after deleting an old incriminating tweet -- so as to fool tweet bot counters:
Conversely, I started with my FTX wrap with the words “criminal financial engineering f**kery” in the 2nd paragraph.
đź”— trungphan.substack.com
đź”— trungphan.substack.com
In NYT article, Alameda CEO admits to misappropriating FTX customer deposits.
Per FTX Terms of Service, the deposits are not FTX’s to use…and FTX can’t loan it.
NYT writes it up FTX “used” and “lent” deposits. Think the appropriate words are: “wire fraud”, “stole”, “theft”.
Per FTX Terms of Service, the deposits are not FTX’s to use…and FTX can’t loan it.
NYT writes it up FTX “used” and “lent” deposits. Think the appropriate words are: “wire fraud”, “stole”, “theft”.
Loading suggestions...