We make the hasty presumption that because a woman appears innocent, gracious and upright, she must be more worthy of a relationship. One ought to realise too that innocence is a guise, and easier to fake for a woman. There is no certainty, ever.

What I'm trying to say is that even if you properly vet a woman, you can still be terribly wrong in your impression of her, even deceived by her apparent graciousness. So, whether you go left or right, certainty is never on the table, and that's fine.

Understand: there are very few women left who you can be close to certain of their purity, but you shouldn't be so sure, either, that you will fall in love with them. Men, like women, still crave danger and play, and a woman who has neither may bore you.

This may come as a drastic take from my end, but I truly believe a prosperous relationship can't be stripped of uncertainty and play and danger; these qualities deepen the heights, but are hard to find in a woman who is both faithful and occasionally unruly.

If a woman is excessively thrill-seeking, she may be mentally deranged, mad, or emotionally unstable. But there are woman who are moderately thrill-seeking, submissive toward their men, and a gratifying pleasure to be around. Not absolutely pure, but devoted.