Modeling my own autosomal ancestry using the formal statistics tool qpadm in the admixtools Harvard Lab package gives me the following results.
Indus Valley Harappan: 68.0
Russia_Sintashta: 27.9
Onge AASI: 4.1
Models using BA Bactria Margiana work as well giving 10% BMAC.
Indus Valley Harappan: 68.0
Russia_Sintashta: 27.9
Onge AASI: 4.1
Models using BA Bactria Margiana work as well giving 10% BMAC.
Here's a pastebin file containing all the qpadm runs. Unfortunately the coverage is 23andme V5 which is poor and gives just gives 133k snps but it is sufficient enough to see that G25 is kinda wonky in many things.
Few notes on this below..+
pastebin.com
Few notes on this below..+
pastebin.com
1) Kangju from historical era works as the best Steppe source, giving the highest p-values.
Other Steppe sources that work just about as well are Andronovo ones mixed with some Siberian like DashtyKozy, Kashikarchi and Taldysay MLBA.
Other Steppe sources that work just about as well are Andronovo ones mixed with some Siberian like DashtyKozy, Kashikarchi and Taldysay MLBA.
This indicates Steppe pops were definitely mixed with BMAC and Siberian Hunter Gatherers when they came to India, which is why Kangju works the best.
G25/Vahaduo etc are extremley weird in terms of how much they inflate BMAC ancestry in NW Indian populations. At most, I got like 10% which probably came via Kangju like Steppe pastoralists.
Loading suggestions...