DeFi Made Here
DeFi Made Here

@DeFi_Made_Here

29 Tweets 10 reads Nov 28, 2022
Introduction to $crvUSD
Part 2
Three birds with one stone.
Thread 🧡
1/ Creating your own stablecoin is basically free money for the protocols.
Just allow users to borrow against their own or external positions and charge a few % annually and/or minting/repayment fee.
2/ This is what a lot of protocols have realized and already deployed their own stablecoin or are in the process of deploying.
For example, @AaveAave has announced its own stablecoin $GHO.
3/ Currently, there are almost $1B of stablecoins borrowed at Aave, if we assume that $GHO will take 1/5 of the Aave stablecoin market share at 2% APR, it will result in an extra $4M revenue per year.
During a bull market, the revenue can go up significantly higher.
4/ But @CurveFinance didn't need another CDP stablecoin. It wouldn't change the situation when TVL is dropping with the price of $CRV.
Source: @tokenterminal
5/ With less liquidity swaps become less efficient ->
-> less trading volume
-> less fees generated
-> $crv becomes less attractive
-> less TVL ... you already know what happens next.
6/ Curve had to solve the problems how to:
β€’ Get more liquidity
β€’ Increase trading volume
β€’ Increase revenue for $veCRV
All of the goals will be accomplished with $crvUSD design.
7/ How can $crvUSD solve these problems?
Since Whitepaper does not clarify all details there will be a few assumptions in the analysis below.
8/
β€’ Get more liquidity
It is not clear yet against what collateral $crvUSD can be minted (looks like only ETH from the beginning), but I assume LP positions (3crv, tricrypto, etc) will also be available later.
9/ Introducing a CDP stablecoin with liquidation-deliquidation mechanism creates a big crypto/stable liquidity by itself.
Additionally, allowing liquidity providers to borrow against their positions will attract even more TVL to Curve liquidity pools.
10/
β€’ Increase trading volume
The unique lending-liquidating AMM algorithm (LLAMMA) allows users to borrow against collateral without the risk of liquidation
At the same time, constant rebalancing is increasing trading volume in the pools and fees generated.
11/ LLAMMA solves the liquidation problem by gradually liquidating/deliquidating users' collateral, converting between collateral and a stablecoin
β€’ as collateral price goes ⬇️, LLAMMA sells it and buys crvUSD
β€’ as collateral price goes ⬆️ again, LLAMMA buys back collateral
15/ It is achieved by dividing collateral price into the bands. Instead of having a specific liquidation price, your collateral has a range of liquidation prices.
Credit to @CurveCap
13/ This is very different from traditional liquidation engines (aave, compound, maker, etc):
β€’ price ⬇️ > your collateral gets sold
β€’ price ⬆️ > you're bagholding USD at the bottom
in LLAMMA:
β€’ price ⬇️ > your collateral gets sold
β€’ price ⬆️ > your collateral gets bought
14/ However LLAMMA also has its drawbacks:
Auto-rebalancing systems are subject to permanent loss. In simple words, LLAMMA will be selling low and buying high every time when rebalancing happens.
This is a trade-off for not losing the whole collateral instead.
15/ As per crvUSD whitepaper these losses are relatively low - only 1% of collateral gets lost at a price drop of 10% below the liquidation threshold during 3 days period.
16/ As Curve is also known for high gas costs, there is another unclear question:
β€’ How will the gas and slippage from the constant rebalancing be paid?
17/
β€’ Increase revenue for $veCRV
Curve is very dependent on $crv and it needs people to lock as much $crv as possible to reduce high selling pressure coming from ~530k $crv daily emissions.
18/ Despite there being a number of liquid wrappers for veCRV and "cashflow for life" hype, investors realize Curve problems and do not lock so much $CRV as before - veCRV percentage is decreasing.
19/ With the introduction of crvUSD there will be new sources of fees for veCRV holders:
β€’ crvUSD borrowing fee
β€’ increased trading volume due to LLAMMA
20/ In the next thread, we will go through the numbers more in-depth to understand if crvUSD can significantly increase the revenue for veCRV holders.
21/ Another important point is how crvUSD stabilizes its peg.
For example, LUSD is always trading above peg and there is no mechanism to satisfy demand without people minting more LUSD against ETH.
22/ While Beanstalk is expanding the supply when the peg is > 1$, but can not reduce the supply when peg is < 1$ and depends on the credit to restore the peg.
23/ crvUSD is algorithmically expanding the supply (minting without collateral) when the peg is > 1$ and reducing the supply (burning) when peg is < 1$.
24/ This way Monetary Policy allows keeping the peg without big PSM, reliance on third-party arbitrageurs, credit, fractional reserves, etc.
25/ Conclusion
I am amazed at how @newmichwill delicately found a way not to create another stablecoin, but to create a stablecoin with a unique design that Curve truly needed.
26/ At the same time crvUSD is solving the stablecoin trilemma:
β€’ Peg maintenance
β€’ Decentralization
β€’ Scalability (Capital efficiency)
27/ Now it is time to wait for the deployment of crvUSD and hopefully for LP positions as collateral.
Until then you can check the first part if you have not yet.
Thank you and stay safe!
28/ That’s a wrap.
If you enjoyed this thread:
1. Follow @DeFi_Made_Here for more helpful threads
2. RT the tweet below to share this thread with your audience

Loading suggestions...