SBF has already said the word ‘oversight’ a million times, he seems to be trying to play this all off as like he was dumb & didn’t know what was going on wrt alameda. he keeps dancing around questions & hasn’t answered anything straight up but sorkin isn’t pressing him that hard

Sorkin has been stern to some degree but at the same time i feel like he’s letting Sam get into these roundabout rants where he sort of talks around the question, doesn’t provide any clarity & most of the the time he doesn’t really answer the question at all. every answer seems

like it’s designed to support this framing of the story where Sam didn’t provide sufficient ‘oversight’ to Alameda’s margin position amongst other things that he should have been concerned with and that was his ‘failure’ but there wasn’t any nefarious action or deliberate fraud

he stopped just short of saying “i don’t think i have any criminal liability” lmao

he also keeps using phrases like “to the best of my knowledge” or “my understanding…” which idk, seems consistent w the idea that he’s trying to play this off as something he just wasn’t aware of (im not a lawyer but maybe its like ‘plausible deniability’?) vs deliberate actions