"...that women are constantly on the “sex circuit” — that they are ALWAYS at any given time of their life, fucking.
"This is not what I have observed."
-- @Pat_Stedman
I am sampling from Pat's email newsletter.
"This is not what I have observed."
-- @Pat_Stedman
I am sampling from Pat's email newsletter.
"What I learned was that WOMEN HAVE SEXUAL SEASONS.
"Women will go out on some dates, maybe hook up and eventually start seeing some guy regularly. And then when this blows up, they might go out on another few dates to feel better."
-- @Pat_Stedman
Yes. And...
"Women will go out on some dates, maybe hook up and eventually start seeing some guy regularly. And then when this blows up, they might go out on another few dates to feel better."
-- @Pat_Stedman
Yes. And...
"But many get tired of this cycle soon after the rebound. They come to the conclusion that “dating sucks” and that it’s not worth the effort. They close themselves off emotionally and even sexually. They focus on hanging out with friends and work."
-- @Pat_Stedman
100%. Yes.
-- @Pat_Stedman
100%. Yes.
What Pat is talking about (this idea of some sexual time, and then... "SEXUAL HIBERNATION") is what I see too.
I have hooked up with many of these girls that have gone months/yrs without sex.
I meet these girls ^, because I am attracted to more modest, introverts.
I have hooked up with many of these girls that have gone months/yrs without sex.
I meet these girls ^, because I am attracted to more modest, introverts.
More THEORY:
Most guys think "women are always fucking" because:
== They ONLY notice "hyper sexual" women. Those women are easy to notice, and typical guys mostly notice the "obvious," so they only know/notice more "overtly sexual girls."
And miss more subtle girls.
Most guys think "women are always fucking" because:
== They ONLY notice "hyper sexual" women. Those women are easy to notice, and typical guys mostly notice the "obvious," so they only know/notice more "overtly sexual girls."
And miss more subtle girls.
>They ONLY notice "hyper sexual" women
>miss more subtle girls
This^ is aggravated by guys with too much "SCREEN TIME." Guys that focus on IG girls or only do online dating.
IG girls/heavy "Tinder" girls are both: "Easy to notice"/seek more male attn.
This ^ is not all girls.
>miss more subtle girls
This^ is aggravated by guys with too much "SCREEN TIME." Guys that focus on IG girls or only do online dating.
IG girls/heavy "Tinder" girls are both: "Easy to notice"/seek more male attn.
This ^ is not all girls.
"NOT ALL WOMEN NEED TO CONSTANTLY HAVE DICK.
"Many women need to 'feel in the mood' to start dating, bcos they have to put themselves out there."
-- @Pat_Stedman
100%. And for "some" DAYGAMERs, we meet these girls... because we meet them when they are "not looking" for dick.
"Many women need to 'feel in the mood' to start dating, bcos they have to put themselves out there."
-- @Pat_Stedman
100%. And for "some" DAYGAMERs, we meet these girls... because we meet them when they are "not looking" for dick.
> "some" DAYGAMERs, we meet these girls
I say "some," because many (most?) daygamers also target "HIGHLY SEXUAL LOOKING WOMEN." That isn't what I am attracted to...
I have lotsa sex with girls that don't look like they have lotsa sex.
I say "some," because many (most?) daygamers also target "HIGHLY SEXUAL LOOKING WOMEN." That isn't what I am attracted to...
I have lotsa sex with girls that don't look like they have lotsa sex.
And this leads to another note on MALE PSYCHOLOGY:
If men that do get laid, mostly aren't successful with "modest" girls, and are mostly/only successful with "slutty" girls... they will assume "all girls" are easy/sexual.
That is the only type they target/succeed with.
If men that do get laid, mostly aren't successful with "modest" girls, and are mostly/only successful with "slutty" girls... they will assume "all girls" are easy/sexual.
That is the only type they target/succeed with.
Loading suggestions...