Shashank Mattoo
Shashank Mattoo

@MattooShashank

11 Tweets 1 reads Mar 04, 2023
Interviewed Ambassador Vijay Gokhale recently
- India's former Foreign Secretary and Ambassador to China
- One of ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ's finest ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ watchers with 30+ years exp.
We spoke about:
- Whether ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ border is intractable
- How ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ sees ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ
- Future of ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ ties
5 key takeaways๐Ÿงต๐Ÿ‘‡(1/11)
(2/11)
Takeaway 1: India & China are now in a state of "armed co-existence" across the LAC
-Border standoff since summer 2020, and Galwan clashes in June that year, have created an "active LAC"
-While there has been limited disengagement, no decrease in ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ regular troops
(3/11)
Takeaway 2: How things changed on the border
-Amb. Gokhale tells me that ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ&๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ made positive steps to resolve crisis between 1990 - 2005
-1993 & '96 border agreements, 2005 agreement on guiding principles to resolve border
BUT
Things began to change post 2006
(4/11)
After 2006:
-China began issuing stapled visas to ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ citizens from J&K and Arunachal Pradesh
-Denied visa to Northern Army Commander Lt. Gen. Jaswal who had command over J&K
-Referred to Arunachal as "South Tibet"
(5/11)
What changed?
Amb. Gokhale argues that ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ feels comfortable when there's a balance of power
After 1990, ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ felt threatened since Soviet Union had collapsed & US was sole superpower
In an effort to reduce threats, ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ worked w.๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ on border
(6/11)
Gokhale: ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ did just enough to ensure that there was peace without making real concessions
What changed?
-Post 2008 crisis, ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ felt US was in decline so reduced threat
- ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ had grown stronger than ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ economically & militarily
Meaning:๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ no longer needed to settle border
(7/11)
Takeaway 3: Despite Galwan, ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ border dispute not unsolvable
-Political mechanism through Special Reps exists
-Historical data exchange b/w both side
-Roadmap to settling boundary laid down in 2005 Agreement
What we need: Mutual trust which๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ will need to rebuild
(8/11)
Takeaway 4: What ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ needs to do to begin rebuilding trust
- Recognise that the boundary is a central part of ties; not small localised issue as ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ likes to say
- Address massive trade deficit b/w ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ &๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ
- Accept ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ's Indo-Pacific concept & not dismiss Indo-Pac as US plot
(9/11)
That last point deserves some explanation
Amb. Gokhale argues that ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ sees "Indo-Pacific" as a construct used by US to contain ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ
Beijing also believes "naive" ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ is signing up to the Indo-Pac because of US pressure
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ doesn't see ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ as independent pwr but as US lackey
(10/11) Takeaway 5: ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ&๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ are entering into "decade of uncertainty"
-๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ will keep edge over ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ nxt decade
BUT
-๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ's growth slowing while ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ's growth is picking up. Gap will narrow & ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ may need to compromise again w. stronger ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ
Delhi will need to be vigilant militarily
(11/11) Grateful to @VGokhale59 for his time and his thoughts on Sino-Indian relations
His books are:
1. Tiananmen: Making of a Protest
2. After Tiananmen: The Rise of China
3. The Long Game: How China negotiates with India
All three are well worth a read & several re-reads

Loading suggestions...